Riolo Maria A, Rohani Pejman
Departments of Mathematics and Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and
Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, and Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 3;112(5):E472-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415573112. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
Pertussis has reemerged as a major public health concern in many countries where it was once considered well controlled. Although the mechanisms responsible for continued pertussis circulation and resurgence remain elusive and contentious, many countries have nevertheless recommended booster vaccinations, the timing and number of which vary widely. Here, using a stochastic, age-stratified transmission model, we searched for cost-effective booster vaccination strategies using a genetic algorithm. We did so assuming four hypothesized mechanisms underpinning contemporary pertussis epidemiology: (I) insufficient coverage, (II) frequent primary vaccine failure, (III) waning of vaccine-derived protection, and (IV) vaccine "leakiness." For scenarios I-IV, successful booster strategies were identified and varied considerably by mechanism. Especially notable is the inability of booster schedules to alleviate resurgence when vaccines are leaky. Critically, our findings argue that the ultimate effectiveness of vaccine booster schedules will likely depend on correctly pinpointing the causes of resurgence, with misdiagnosis of the problem epidemiologically ineffective and economically costly.
百日咳在许多曾被认为已得到良好控制的国家再度成为重大公共卫生问题。尽管导致百日咳持续传播和再度流行的机制仍不明确且存在争议,但许多国家仍建议进行加强免疫接种,其时间和次数差异很大。在此,我们使用一个随机的、按年龄分层的传播模型,通过遗传算法寻找具有成本效益的加强免疫接种策略。我们在假设支撑当代百日咳流行病学的四种假说机制的情况下进行了这项研究:(I)覆盖率不足,(II)初次疫苗频繁失效,(III)疫苗衍生保护作用减弱,以及(IV)疫苗“渗漏”。对于情景I - IV,我们确定了成功的加强免疫策略,且这些策略因机制不同而有很大差异。特别值得注意的是,当疫苗存在渗漏时,加强免疫接种计划无法缓解疫情的再度流行。至关重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,疫苗加强免疫接种计划的最终效果可能取决于能否正确查明再度流行的原因,对问题的错误流行病学诊断在效果上无效且在经济上代价高昂。