From the *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan; †Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich; ‡Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; and §Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Clin Nucl Med. 2015 May;40(5):378-83. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000699.
The predictive value of FDG PET at thyroid remnant ablation was evaluated in comparison to radioiodine uptake in high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.
One hundred forty-one patients who underwent radioiodine therapy (RIT) after total thyroidectomy and received at least 1 further RIT due to suspected metastases were retrospectively analyzed. Patients had not received RIT previously. FDG PET was performed before thyroid remnant ablation. Thyroid-stimulating hormone-stimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) was measured for biochemical response assessment (change of Tg between the first and second RIT, ΔTg).
Biochemical response could be evaluated in 80 patients; survival data could be obtained for 88 patients (maximum, 124 months). Biochemical response was significantly better in patients with radioiodine-positive metastases compared with patients with radioiodine-negative metastases (median ΔTg I+, 55.8% vs I-, 112.6%; P < 0.01). Regarding survival, deaths occurred later in patients with radioiodine-positive metastases compared with radioiodine-negative patients; however, there was no significant difference regarding overall survival (I+, 61.3% vs I-, 58.2%; P > 0.05). Patients with FDG-positive metastases at thyroid remnant ablation showed a poorer biochemical response compared with patients with FDG-negative metastases (median ΔTg FDG+, 77.5% vs FDG-, 53.2%; P < 0.05), and these groups also differed significantly regarding survival (overall survival FDG+, 48.5% vs FDG-, 100%, P < 0.05).
At thyroid remnant ablation, FDG PET is more predictive for long-term survival, whereas radioiodine uptake is more important for short-term response. FDG PET performed at thyroid remnant ablation might represent a useful tool for management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.
评估 18F-FDG PET 在甲状腺残留组织消融术(thyroid remnant ablation)中的预测价值,并与分化型甲状腺癌高危患者的放射性碘摄取(radioiodine uptake)进行比较。
回顾性分析了 141 例在甲状腺全切除术后接受放射性碘治疗(RIT)并因疑似转移而接受至少 1 次进一步 RIT 的患者。患者之前未接受过 RIT。在甲状腺残留组织消融术之前进行 18F-FDG PET 检查。检测甲状腺刺激激素(thyroid-stimulating hormone,TSH)刺激的血清甲状腺球蛋白(thyroglobulin,Tg),以评估生化反应(两次 RIT 之间 Tg 的变化,ΔTg)。
80 例患者的生化反应可进行评估;88 例患者(最长随访时间 124 个月)的生存数据可获得。放射性碘阳性转移患者的生化反应明显优于放射性碘阴性转移患者(中位数ΔTg I+,55.8% vs I-,112.6%;P<0.01)。在生存方面,放射性碘阳性转移患者的死亡时间晚于放射性碘阴性患者,但总生存无显著差异(I+,61.3% vs I-,58.2%;P>0.05)。在甲状腺残留组织消融术时,18F-FDG 阳性转移患者的生化反应较 18F-FDG 阴性转移患者差(中位数ΔTg FDG+,77.5% vs FDG-,53.2%;P<0.05),两组的生存情况也存在显著差异(总生存 FDG+,48.5% vs FDG-,100%;P<0.05)。
在甲状腺残留组织消融术时,18F-FDG PET 对长期生存的预测性更高,而放射性碘摄取对短期反应更为重要。18F-FDG PET 可作为分化型甲状腺癌高危患者管理的有用工具。