Suppr超能文献

局灶性癫痫患者发作间期癫痫放电的电和磁源成像分布式逆解的定位准确性

Localization Accuracy of Distributed Inverse Solutions for Electric and Magnetic Source Imaging of Interictal Epileptic Discharges in Patients with Focal Epilepsy.

作者信息

Heers Marcel, Chowdhury Rasheda A, Hedrich Tanguy, Dubeau François, Hall Jeffery A, Lina Jean-Marc, Grova Christophe, Kobayashi Eliane

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Room 786, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.

Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Topogr. 2016 Jan;29(1):162-81. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0423-1. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Abstract

Distributed inverse solutions aim to realistically reconstruct the origin of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) from noninvasively recorded electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals. Our aim was to compare the performance of different distributed inverse solutions in localizing IEDs: coherent maximum entropy on the mean (cMEM), hierarchical Bayesian implementations of independent identically distributed sources (IID, minimum norm prior) and spatially coherent sources (COH, spatial smoothness prior). Source maxima (i.e., the vertex with the maximum source amplitude) of IEDs in 14 EEG and 19 MEG studies from 15 patients with focal epilepsy were analyzed. We visually compared their concordance with intracranial EEG (iEEG) based on 17 cortical regions of interest and their spatial dispersion around source maxima. Magnetic source imaging (MSI) maxima from cMEM were most often confirmed by iEEG (cMEM: 14/19, COH: 9/19, IID: 8/19 studies). COH electric source imaging (ESI) maxima co-localized best with iEEG (cMEM: 8/14, COH: 11/14, IID: 10/14 studies). In addition, cMEM was less spatially spread than COH and IID for ESI and MSI (p < 0.001 Bonferroni-corrected post hoc t test). Highest positive predictive values for cortical regions with IEDs in iEEG could be obtained with cMEM for MSI and with COH for ESI. Additional realistic EEG/MEG simulations confirmed our findings. Accurate spatially extended sources, as found in cMEM (ESI and MSI) and COH (ESI) are desirable for source imaging of IEDs because this might influence surgical decision. Our simulations suggest that COH and IID overestimate the spatial extent of the generators compared to cMEM.

摘要

分布式逆解旨在根据无创记录的脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)信号,切实重建发作间期癫痫样放电(IED)的起源。我们的目的是比较不同分布式逆解在定位IED方面的性能:平均相干最大熵(cMEM)、独立同分布源层次贝叶斯实现(IID,最小范数先验)和空间相干源(COH,空间平滑先验)。分析了15例局灶性癫痫患者的14项EEG研究和19项MEG研究中IED的源最大值(即源振幅最大的顶点)。我们基于17个感兴趣的皮质区域,直观地比较了它们与颅内EEG(iEEG)的一致性,以及它们在源最大值周围的空间离散度。cMEM的磁源成像(MSI)最大值最常被iEEG证实(cMEM:14/19,COH:9/19,IID:8/19研究)。COH电源成像(ESI)最大值与iEEG的共定位最佳(cMEM:8/14,COH:11/14,IID:10/14研究)。此外,对于ESI和MSI,cMEM在空间上的分布比COH和IID更集中(经Bonferroni校正的事后t检验,p<0.001)。对于iEEG中存在IED的皮质区域,MSI使用cMEM、ESI使用COH可获得最高的阳性预测值。额外的逼真EEG/MEG模拟证实了我们的发现。在IED的源成像中,需要如cMEM(ESI和MSI)和COH(ESI)中那样精确的空间扩展源,因为这可能会影响手术决策。我们的模拟表明,与cMEM相比,COH和IID高估了发生器的空间范围。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验