Mathai S S, Adhikari K M, Rajeev A
Professor & Head, Department of Paediatrics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Jan;71(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
Both the self inflating bag and the T-piece resuscitator are recommended for neonatal resuscitation, but many health care workers are unfamiliar with using the latter. A prospective, comparative, observational study was done to determine the ease and effectiveness of training of health care personnel in the two devices using infant training manikins.
100 health care workers, who had no prior formal training in neonatal resuscitation, were divided into small groups and trained in the use of the two devices by qualified trainers. Assessment of cognitive skills was done by pre and post MCQs. Psychomotor skill was assessed post training on manikins using a 10-point objective score. Acceptance by users was ascertained by questionnaire. Assessments were also done after 24 h and 3 months. Comparison was done by Chi square and paired t-tests.
Pre-training cognitive tests increased from 3.77 (+1.58) to 6.99 (+1.28) on day of training which was significant. Post training assessment of psychomotor skills showed significantly higher initial scores for the T-piece group (7.07 + 2.57) on day of training. Reassessment after 24 h showed significant improvement in cognitive scores (9.89 + 1.24) and psychomotor scores in both groups (8.86 + 1.42 for self inflating bag and 9.70 + 0.57 for T-piece resuscitator). After 3-6 months the scores in both domains showed some decline which was not statistically significant. User acceptability was the same for both devices.
It is equally easy to train health care workers in both devices. Both groups showed good short term recall and both devices were equally acceptable to the users.
自动充气式气囊和T组合复苏器均被推荐用于新生儿复苏,但许多医护人员并不熟悉后者的使用方法。本研究进行了一项前瞻性、对比性观察研究,以确定使用婴儿训练模型对医护人员进行这两种设备培训的难易程度和效果。
100名之前未接受过新生儿复苏正规培训的医护人员被分成小组,由合格的培训师对其进行这两种设备使用方法的培训。通过培训前后的多项选择题评估认知技能。培训后使用10分制客观评分在模型上评估操作技能。通过问卷调查确定使用者的接受程度。在24小时和3个月后也进行了评估。采用卡方检验和配对t检验进行比较。
培训当天,培训前认知测试成绩从3.77(±1.58)提高到6.99(±1.28)有显著差异。培训后操作技能评估显示,培训当天T组合复苏器组的初始得分显著更高(7.07 ± 2.57)。24小时后重新评估显示,两组的认知得分(9.89 ± 1.24)和操作得分均有显著提高(自动充气式气囊组为(8.86 ± 1.42),T组合复苏器组为9.70 ± 0.57)。3至6个月后,两个领域的得分均有一定下降,但无统计学意义。两种设备的用户接受度相同。
对医护人员进行这两种设备的培训同样容易。两组均显示出良好的短期记忆,且两种设备对用户的接受度相同。