• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个新型电子学习系统中,使用学习对象和重复测试对医学生事实性知识记忆的特征描述。

Characterization of medical students recall of factual knowledge using learning objects and repeated testing in a novel e-learning system.

作者信息

Taveira-Gomes Tiago, Prado-Costa Rui, Severo Milton, Ferreira Maria Amélia

机构信息

Department of Medical Education and Simulation, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

ALERT Life Sciences Computing, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jan 24;15:4. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0275-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-014-0275-0
PMID:25616353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4326410/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spaced-repetition and test-enhanced learning are two methodologies that boost knowledge retention. ALERT STUDENT is a platform that allows creation and distribution of Learning Objects named flashcards, and provides insight into student judgments-of-learning through a metric called 'recall accuracy'. This study aims to understand how the spaced-repetition and test-enhanced learning features provided by the platform affect recall accuracy, and to characterize the effect that students, flashcards and repetitions exert on this measurement.

METHODS

Three spaced laboratory sessions (s0, s1 and s2), were conducted with n=96 medical students. The intervention employed a study task, and a quiz task that consisted in mentally answering open-ended questions about each flashcard and grading recall accuracy. Students were randomized into study-quiz and quiz groups. On s0 both groups performed the quiz task. On s1 and s2, the study-quiz group performed the study task followed by the quiz task, whereas the quiz group only performed the quiz task. We measured differences in recall accuracy between groups/sessions, its variance components, and the G-coefficients for the flashcard component.

RESULTS

At s0 there were no differences in recall accuracy between groups. The experiment group achieved a significant increase in recall accuracy that was superior to the quiz group in s1 and s2. In the study-quiz group, increases in recall accuracy were mainly due to the session, followed by flashcard factors and student factors. In the quiz group, increases in recall accuracy were mainly accounted by flashcard factors, followed by student and session factors. The flashcard G-coefficient indicated an agreement on recall accuracy of 91% in the quiz group, and of 47% in the study-quiz group.

CONCLUSIONS

Recall accuracy is an easily collectible measurement that increases the educational value of Learning Objects and open-ended questions. This metric seems to vary in a way consistent with knowledge retention, but further investigation is necessary to ascertain the nature of such relationship. Recall accuracy has educational implications to students and educators, and may contribute to deliver tailored learning experiences, assess the effectiveness of instruction, and facilitate research comparing blended-learning interventions.

摘要

背景

间隔重复学习法和测试强化学习法是两种有助于提高知识留存率的方法。“ALERT STUDENT”是一个平台,它允许创建和分发名为抽认卡的学习对象,并通过一种名为“回忆准确率”的指标深入了解学生的学习判断。本研究旨在了解该平台提供的间隔重复学习法和测试强化学习功能如何影响回忆准确率,并描述学生、抽认卡和重复操作对这一测量结果的影响。

方法

对96名医学生进行了三次间隔的实验室课程(s0、s1和s2)。干预措施包括一项学习任务和一项测验任务,测验任务要求学生在脑海中回答关于每张抽认卡的开放式问题并评定回忆准确率。学生被随机分为学习-测验组和测验组。在s0时,两组都进行了测验任务。在s1和s2时,学习-测验组先进行学习任务,然后进行测验任务,而测验组只进行测验任务。我们测量了组间/课程间回忆准确率的差异、其方差成分以及抽认卡成分的G系数。

结果

在s0时,两组的回忆准确率没有差异。实验组在s1和s2时的回忆准确率显著提高,优于测验组。在学习-测验组中,回忆准确率的提高主要归因于课程,其次是抽认卡因素和学生因素。在测验组中,回忆准确率的提高主要由抽认卡因素导致,其次是学生和课程因素。抽认卡G系数表明,测验组在回忆准确率上的一致性为91%,学习-测验组为47%。

结论

回忆准确率是一种易于收集的测量指标,它提高了学习对象和开放式问题的教育价值。这个指标的变化方式似乎与知识留存率一致,但需要进一步研究以确定这种关系的本质。回忆准确率对学生和教育工作者具有教育意义,可能有助于提供个性化的学习体验、评估教学效果以及促进比较混合学习干预措施的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d974/4326410/e864100b9897/12909_2014_275_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d974/4326410/e864100b9897/12909_2014_275_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d974/4326410/e864100b9897/12909_2014_275_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterization of medical students recall of factual knowledge using learning objects and repeated testing in a novel e-learning system.在一个新型电子学习系统中,使用学习对象和重复测试对医学生事实性知识记忆的特征描述。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jan 24;15:4. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0275-0.
2
A novel collaborative e-learning platform for medical students - ALERT STUDENT.一个面向医学生的新型协作式电子学习平台——ALERT STUDENT。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 14;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-143.
3
Rad Path in a Flash: Creation of the First AMSER Sponsored Digital Flashcard Deck and a Review of Digital Flashcard Use among? Medical Students.快速掌握病理学:首个 AMSER 赞助的数字 flashcard 牌组的创建,以及医学生使用数字 flashcard 的回顾。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Feb;31(2):426-430. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.039.
4
Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.新型医学教育方法:与传统基于讲座的教学模式相比,使用互动式医学软件可提高学生的保留率。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.12.007.
5
Impact of test-enhanced learning as a study strategy: An exploratory study with first-year dental students.作为一种学习策略的测试强化学习的影响:一项针对牙科一年级学生的探索性研究。
J Dent Educ. 2022 Dec;86(12):1611-1619. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13066. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Comparative effects of test-enhanced learning and self-explanation on long-term retention.测试增强学习与自我解释对长期保持的比较效果。
Med Educ. 2013 Jul;47(7):674-82. doi: 10.1111/medu.12141.
7
Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial.在现代德国医学课程中,自主学习的效果可能优于直接教学——一项混合方法试验的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 3;16:158. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0679-0.
8
Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying.使用电子闪存卡促进医学生学习:重测与重学。
Med Educ. 2011 Nov;45(11):1101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04043.x.
9
Enhancing learning through optimal sequencing of web-based and manikin simulators to teach shock physiology in the medical curriculum.通过优化基于网络的模拟器和人体模型模拟器的顺序,在医学课程中教授休克生理学,以增强学习效果。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2011 Dec;35(4):402-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00061.2011.
10
Introducing global health into the undergraduate medical school curriculum using an e-learning program: a mixed method pilot study.使用电子学习项目将全球健康纳入本科医学院课程:一项混合方法试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Sep 2;15:142. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0421-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of physiology knowledge among medical students in basic science: a cross-sectional study.医学生基础科学阶段生理学知识的掌握情况:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07543-7.
2
Comparing the efficacy of live vs. video instructional demonstrations in dental education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较现场教学与视频教学演示在牙科教育中的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06672-3.
3
Assessment and evaluation of a serious game for teaching factual knowledge in dental education.

本文引用的文献

1
The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.测试记忆的力量:基础研究及其对教育实践的启示。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.
2
A novel collaborative e-learning platform for medical students - ALERT STUDENT.一个面向医学生的新型协作式电子学习平台——ALERT STUDENT。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 14;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-143.
3
Using cognitive theory to facilitate medical education.运用认知理论促进医学教育。
评估和评价一款用于牙科教育的教授事实性知识的严肃游戏。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04498-5.
4
Flashcards: The Preferred Online Game-Based Study Tool Self-Selected by Students to Review Medical Histology Image Content.抽认卡:学生自主选择的用于复习医学组织学图像内容的首选在线游戏化学习工具。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1406:209-224. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-26462-7_10.
5
Attitudes of an international student cohort to the Quizlet study system employed in an advanced clinical health care review course.一群国际学生对高级临床医疗保健复习课程中使用的Quizlet学习系统的态度。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(4):3833-3857. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11371-3. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
6
Support for learning under naturalistic conditions.支持在自然条件下学习。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Sep 24;7(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00435-0.
7
Recall of Prior Knowledge in Medical Microbiology Among Medical Interns: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Assessment in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医学实习生对医学微生物学先前知识的回顾:一项多中心横断面评估
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Jul 18;13:733-739. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S364330. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of the effect of two teaching methods on surgical technologist students' learning and satisfaction (flashcards vs. mobile-based learning).两种教学方法对外科技术专业学生学习效果和满意度的比较(抽认卡法与移动学习法)
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Dec 31;10:467. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_940_20. eCollection 2021.
9
Evidence of the Spacing Effect and Influences on Perceptions of Learning and Science Curricula.间隔效应的证据及其对学习认知和科学课程的影响。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 13;14(1):e21201. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21201. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review.概念化健康专业教育中的间隔学习:范围综述。
Med Educ. 2020 Mar;54(3):205-216. doi: 10.1111/medu.14025. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 14;14:79. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-79.
4
We lived and breathed medicine - then life catches up: medical students' reflections.我们曾全身心地投入医学——但生活总会不期而至:医学生的反思。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 1;14:66. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-66.
5
Use of a virtual world computer environment for international distance education: lessons from a pilot project using Second Life.利用虚拟世界计算机环境进行国际远程教育:Second Life 试点项目的经验教训。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Feb 21;14:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-36.
6
Cumulative assessment: strategic choices to influence students' study effort.累积评估:影响学生学习努力程度的策略选择。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Dec 27;13:172. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-172.
7
Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing.元记忆信息源:学习判断和熟悉感。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Sep;1(3):357-75. doi: 10.3758/BF03213977.
8
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
9
Clinical teaching and learning: from theory and research to application.临床教学与学习:从理论与研究到应用。
Med J Aust. 2012 May 7;196(8):527. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11473.
10
How we use social media to supplement a novel curriculum in medical education.我们如何利用社交媒体来补充医学教育中的新课程。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):439-44. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668245. Epub 2012 Mar 27.