Koutouzis Theofilos, Gadalla Hana, Lundgren Tord
Department of Periodontology, College of Dental Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, MI, USA.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):161-7. doi: 10.1111/cid.12287. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
The aim of this study is to utilize an in vitro dynamic loading model to assess the potential risk of bacterial invasion into the Implant Abutment Interface (IAI) microgap of dental implants with sloped marginal design.
Forty implants were divided into two groups (n = 20 per group) based on implant marginal design. Group 1 was comprised of implants with Morse-taper connection and conventional marginal design that connected to titanium abutments. Group 2 was comprised of implants with Morse-taper connection and sloped marginal design that connected to titanium abutments. The specimens were immersed in a bacterial solution of E. coli and loaded with 500,000 cycles of 160N using a chewing simulator. Following disconnection of fixtures and abutments, microbial samples were taken from the threaded portion of the abutment, plated and cultured under appropriate conditions.
Ten out of twenty implants of Group 1 and eight out of twenty implants of Group 2 had IAI microgaps colonized by E. Coli. There was not a statistically significant difference in the mean number of E. Coli CFU detected between implants of Group 1 (mean 19.2, SD 23.6) and Group 2 (mean 12.5, SD18.9) (p > .05).
The present study demonstrated that implants with a sloped marginal design exhibited similar risk for bacterial invasion into the IAI microgap under in vitro dynamic loading conditions compared to implants with conventional marginal design.
本研究旨在利用体外动态加载模型,评估具有倾斜边缘设计的牙种植体植入体基台界面(IAI)微间隙细菌侵入的潜在风险。
根据种植体边缘设计将40颗种植体分为两组(每组n = 20)。第1组由具有莫氏锥度连接和与钛基台相连的传统边缘设计的种植体组成。第2组由具有莫氏锥度连接和与钛基台相连的倾斜边缘设计的种植体组成。将标本浸入大肠杆菌细菌溶液中,并使用咀嚼模拟器加载500,000次160N的循环。在分离固定装置和基台后,从基台的螺纹部分采集微生物样本,接种并在适当条件下培养。
第1组20颗种植体中有10颗,第2组20颗种植体中有8颗的IAI微间隙被大肠杆菌定植。第1组种植体(平均19.2,标准差23.6)和第2组种植体(平均12.5,标准差18.9)检测到的大肠杆菌CFU平均数无统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。
本研究表明,在体外动态加载条件下,与具有传统边缘设计的种植体相比,具有倾斜边缘设计的种植体在IAI微间隙细菌侵入方面表现出相似的风险。