Pereira Hugo M, Spears Vincent C, Schlinder-Delap Bonnie, Yoon Tejin, Nielson Kristy A, Hunter Sandra K
Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Jun;115(6):1367-79. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3113-0. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
These studies determined (1) age- and sex-related differences in steadiness of isometric contractions when high cognitive demand was imposed across a range of forces with the elbow flexor muscles (study 1) and; (2) sex differences in steadiness among older adults when low cognitive demand was imposed (study 2).
36 young adults (18-25 years; 18 women) and 30 older adults (60-82 years; 17 women) performed isometric contractions at 5, 30 and 40 % of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Study 1 involved a high-cognitive demand session (serial subtractions by 13 during the contraction) and a control session (no mental math). Study 2 (older adults only) involved a low-cognitive demand session (subtracting by 1s).
Older individuals exhibited greater increases in force fluctuations (coefficient of variation of force, CV) with high cognitive demand than young adults, with the largest age difference at 5 % MVC (P = 0.01). Older adults had greater agonist EMG activity with high-cognitive demand and women had greater coactivation than men (P < 0.05). In study 2, CV of force increased with low cognitive demand for the older women but not for the older men (P = 0.03).
Older adults had reduced steadiness and increased muscle activation when high cognitive demand was imposed while low cognitive demand induced increased force fluctuations in older women but not older men. These findings have implications for daily and work-related tasks that involve cognitive demand performed simultaneously during submaximal isometric contractions in an aging workforce.
这些研究确定了:(1)当对屈肘肌在一系列力量水平上施加高认知需求时,等长收缩稳定性方面的年龄和性别差异(研究1);以及(2)当施加低认知需求时,老年人之间的性别稳定性差异(研究2)。
36名年轻人(18 - 25岁;18名女性)和30名老年人(60 - 82岁;17名女性)在最大自主收缩(MVC)的5%、30%和40%水平下进行等长收缩。研究1包括一个高认知需求阶段(收缩期间连续减13)和一个对照阶段(不进行心算)。研究2(仅针对老年人)包括一个低认知需求阶段(逐次减1)。
与年轻人相比,老年人在高认知需求下力量波动(力量变异系数,CV)的增加更大,在5%MVC时年龄差异最大(P = 0.01)。老年人在高认知需求下有更大的主动肌肌电图活动,女性的共激活比男性更大(P < 0.05)。在研究2中,低认知需求时老年女性的力量CV增加,而老年男性则没有(P = 0.03)。
当施加高认知需求时,老年人的稳定性降低且肌肉激活增加,而低认知需求会导致老年女性力量波动增加,但老年男性不会。这些发现对涉及在老年劳动力进行次最大等长收缩时同时进行认知需求的日常和工作相关任务具有启示意义。