Hazime Fuad Ahmad, de Freitas Diego Galace, Monteiro Renan Lima, Maretto Rafaela Lasso, Carvalho Nilza Aparecida de Almeida, Hasue Renata Hydee, João Silvia Maria Amado
Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Avenida São Sebastião, 2819, CEP: 64202-020, Parnaíba, PI, Brasil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language Pathology and Occupational Therapy, Doctoral Programs in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Rua Cipotânea, 51, Cidade Universitária, CEP: 05360-160, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jan 31;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0461-1.
Chronic non-specific low back pain is a major socioeconomic public health issue worldwide and, despite the volume of research in the area, it is still a difficult-to-treat condition. The conservative analgesic therapy usually comprises a variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. The neuromatrix pain model and the new findings on the process of chronicity of pain point to a higher effectiveness of treatments that address central rather than peripheral structures. The transcranial direct current stimulation is a noninvasive technique of neuromodulation that has made recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain. The simultaneous combination of these two electrostimulation techniques (cerebral and peripheral) can provide an analgesic effect superior to isolated interventions. However, all the evidence on the analgesic efficacy of these techniques, alone or combined, is still fragmented. This is a protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate whether cerebral electrical stimulation combined with peripheral electrical stimulation is more effective in relieving pain than the isolated application of electrical stimulations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
METHODS/DESIGN: Ninety-two patients will be randomized into four groups to receive transcranial direct current stimulation (real/sham) + transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (real/sham) for 12 sessions over a period of four weeks. The primary clinical outcome (pain intensity) and the secondary ones (sensory and affective aspects of pain, physical functioning and global perceived effect) will be recorded before treatment, after four weeks, in Month 3 and in Month 6 after randomization. Confounding factors such as anxiety and depression, the patient's satisfaction with treatment and adverse effects will also be listed. Data will be collected by an examiner unaware of (blind to) the treatment allocation.
The results of this study may assist in clinical decision-making about the combined use of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation for pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain.
NCT01896453.
慢性非特异性下腰痛是全球主要的社会经济公共卫生问题,尽管该领域研究众多,但它仍是一种难治性疾病。保守镇痛治疗通常包括多种药物和非药物策略,如经皮电刺激神经疗法。神经矩阵疼痛模型以及疼痛慢性化过程的新发现表明,针对中枢而非外周结构的治疗效果更佳。经颅直流电刺激是一种非侵入性神经调节技术,在慢性疼痛治疗方面取得了新进展。这两种电刺激技术(脑部和外周)联合使用可产生优于单独干预的镇痛效果。然而,关于这些技术单独或联合使用的镇痛效果的所有证据仍然零散。这是一项随机临床试验方案,旨在研究在慢性非特异性下腰痛患者中,脑部电刺激联合外周电刺激在缓解疼痛方面是否比单独应用电刺激更有效。
方法/设计:92名患者将被随机分为四组,接受经颅直流电刺激(真刺激/假刺激)+经皮电刺激神经疗法(真刺激/假刺激),为期四周,共12次治疗。主要临床结局(疼痛强度)和次要结局(疼痛的感觉和情感方面、身体功能及整体感知效果)将在治疗前、随机分组后四周、第3个月和第6个月记录。还将列出焦虑和抑郁等混杂因素、患者对治疗的满意度及不良反应。数据将由一名对治疗分配不知情(盲法)的检查者收集。
本研究结果可能有助于临床决策,确定脑部和外周电刺激联合使用对慢性下腰痛患者缓解疼痛的效果。
NCT01896453。