Seltzer Jonathan H, Turner J Rick, Geiger Mary Jane, Rosano Giuseppe, Mahaffey Kenneth W, White William B, Sabol Mary Beth, Stockbridge Norman, Sager Philip T
ACI Clinical, Bala Cynwyd, PA.
Quintiles, Durham, NC.
Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
This white paper provides a summary of presentations and discussions at a cardiovascular (CV) end point adjudication think tank cosponsored by the Cardiac Safety Research Committee and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that was convened at the FDA's White Oak headquarters on November 6, 2013. Attention was focused on the lack of clarity concerning the need for end point adjudication in both CV and non-CV trials: there is currently an absence of widely accepted academic or industry standards and a definitive regulatory policy on how best to structure and use clinical end point committees (CECs). This meeting therefore provided a forum for leaders in the fields of CV clinical trials and CV safety to develop a foundation of initial best practice recommendations for use in future CEC charters. Attendees included representatives from pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies, end point adjudication specialist groups, clinical research organizations, and active, academically based adjudicators. The manuscript presents recommendations from the think tank regarding when CV end point adjudication should be considered in trials conducted by cardiologists and by noncardiologists as well as detailing key issues in the composition of a CEC and its charter. In addition, it presents several recommended best practices for the establishment and operation of CECs. The science underlying CV event adjudication is evolving, and suggestions for additional areas of research will be needed to continue to advance this science. This manuscript does not constitute regulatory guidance.
本白皮书总结了由心脏安全研究委员会和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)联合主办的心血管(CV)终点判定智库会议的报告和讨论内容。该会议于2013年11月6日在FDA的白橡树总部召开。会议重点关注了CV试验和非CV试验中终点判定必要性方面缺乏明确性的问题:目前缺乏广泛认可的学术或行业标准,以及关于如何最佳构建和使用临床终点委员会(CEC)的明确监管政策。因此,本次会议为CV临床试验和CV安全领域的领导者提供了一个论坛,以制定用于未来CEC章程的初步最佳实践建议基础。与会者包括制药公司、监管机构、终点判定专家小组、临床研究组织的代表,以及活跃的、以学术为基础的判定人员。本手稿介绍了智库关于在心脏病专家和非心脏病专家进行的试验中何时应考虑CV终点判定的建议,并详细说明了CEC的组成及其章程中的关键问题。此外,它还提出了CEC设立和运作的若干推荐最佳实践。CV事件判定的科学依据正在不断发展,需要对更多研究领域提出建议,以继续推动这一科学的发展。本手稿不构成监管指南。