Erdoğan M, Desteli E E, Ímren Y, Kiliç M, Ulusoy S, Varli A
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(6):387-91.
PURPOSE Of
To compare the clinical results of clavicular fractures operated by superior locking plate using either horizontal or vertical incision by physical examination and nerve conduction tests.
Between January 2010 and January 2013, 63 patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fracture were treated with superior locking plate (22 female, 41 male) with either horizontal (n = 38) or vertical incisions (n = 25). Mean interval between trauma and surgery was 3 days (1 to 8 days). Electrodiagnostic tests were performed to 15 patients who felt numbness across their shoulder or chest and ASES test was performed to each of the patient 12 weeks postoperatively. IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM SPSS, Türkiye) programme was used for statistical analysis. Student t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed parameters (quantity) and continuity (yates) test was used. p < 0.05 was accepted to be statistically signifiant.
8 patients of the horizontal incision group and 7 patients of the vertical incision group described numbness across their shoulders. 14 patients had abnormal sensorial electrodiagnostic fidings. Comparison of electrodiagnostic fidings did not reveal any statistical signifiance. The mean ASES score of the affected shoulder was 76.39 ±1.20 in the horizontal group, in the vertical group it was found to be 79.00 ± 2.5 ( p < 0.01).
Electrodiagnostic study revealed similar results in both groups. According to these results, signifiant difference in mean ASES scores of both groups was not related to sensorial injury of the supraclavicular nerve.
通过体格检查和神经传导测试,比较采用水平或垂直切口的锁骨上方锁定钢板治疗锁骨骨折的临床效果。
2010年1月至2013年1月,63例中段锁骨移位骨折患者接受了锁骨上方锁定钢板治疗(女性22例,男性41例),其中采用水平切口的38例,采用垂直切口的25例。创伤至手术的平均间隔时间为3天(1至8天)。对15例肩部或胸部有麻木感的患者进行了电诊断测试,并在术后12周对每位患者进行了ASES测试。使用IBM SPSS Statistics 22(IBM SPSS,土耳其)程序进行统计分析。采用学生t检验比较正态分布参数(数量),采用连续性(耶茨)检验。p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
水平切口组8例患者和垂直切口组7例患者描述肩部有麻木感。14例患者有异常的感觉电诊断结果。电诊断结果的比较未显示任何统计学意义。水平组患侧肩部的平均ASES评分为76.39±1.20,垂直组为79.00±2.5(p<0.01)。
电诊断研究显示两组结果相似。根据这些结果,两组平均ASES评分的显著差异与锁骨上神经感觉损伤无关。