Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):842-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
The "average" patient has a literacy level of US grade 8 (age 13-14 years), but this may be lower for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Current guidelines suggest that patient education materials should be pitched at a literacy level of around 5th grade (age 10-11 years). This study aims to evaluate the readability of written materials targeted at patients with CKD.
Systematic review.
SETTING & POPULATION: Patient information materials aimed at adults with CKD and written in English.
SEARCH STRATEGY & SOURCES: Patient education materials designed to be printed and read, sourced from practices in Australia and online at all known websites run by relevant international CKD organizations during March 2014.
Quantitative analysis of readability using Lexile Analyzer and Flesch-Kincaid tools.
We analyzed 80 materials. Both Lexile Analyzer and Flesch-Kincaid analyses suggested that most materials required a minimum of grade 9 (age 14-15 years) schooling to read them. Only 5% of materials were pitched at the recommended level (grade 5).
Readability formulas have inherent limitations and do not account for visual information. We did not consider other media through which patients with CKD may access information. Although the study covered materials from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, all non-Internet materials were sourced locally, and it is possible that some international paper-based materials were missed. Generalizability may be limited due to exclusion of non-English materials.
These findings suggest that patient information materials aimed at patients with CKD are pitched above the average patient's literacy level. This issue is compounded by cognitive decline in patients with CKD, who may have lower literacy than the average patient. It suggests that information providers need to consider their audience more carefully when preparing patient information materials, including user testing with a low-literacy patient population.
“一般”患者的文化水平为美国 8 年级(13-14 岁),但对于慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者来说,这个水平可能更低。目前的指南建议,患者教育材料的文化水平应达到 5 年级(10-11 岁)左右。本研究旨在评估针对 CKD 患者的书面材料的可读性。
系统评价。
以成年 CKD 患者为目标人群且以英文书写的患者信息材料。
2014 年 3 月,从澳大利亚的诊所和所有已知的相关国际 CKD 组织的在线网站上获取旨在打印和阅读的患者教育材料。
使用 Lexile 分析仪和 Flesch-Kincaid 工具进行定量可读性分析。
我们分析了 80 种材料。Lexile 分析仪和 Flesch-Kincaid 分析均表明,大多数材料需要至少 9 年级(14-15 岁)的教育程度才能阅读。只有 5%的材料符合推荐水平(5 年级)。
可读性公式存在固有局限性,并且不考虑视觉信息。我们没有考虑 CKD 患者可能通过其他媒体获取信息。尽管该研究涵盖了来自美国、英国和澳大利亚的材料,但所有非互联网材料都是在当地获取的,因此有可能错过了一些国际纸质材料。由于排除了非英语材料,因此可能会限制其普遍性。
这些发现表明,针对 CKD 患者的患者信息材料的目标人群高于一般患者的文化水平。对于 CKD 患者认知能力下降的情况,这个问题更加严重,他们的文化水平可能低于一般患者。这表明信息提供者在准备患者信息材料时需要更加仔细地考虑其受众,包括对低文化水平患者群体进行用户测试。