Hong Hye-Ryun, Ha Chang-Duk, Kong Ji-Young, Lee Sang-Hee, Song Moon-Goo, Kang Hyun-Sik
College of Sport Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2014 Dec;18(4):361-9. doi: 10.5717/jenb.2014.18.4.361. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Little is known about the potential role of lifestyle factors in sex differences in insulin resistance in late elementary school children.
In this cross-sectional study, we compared sex differences in Tanner scales, body fat, physical activity (PA) and fitness, and insulin resistance markers in elementary school children (boys, n = 69 and girls, n = 81) aged 12-13 years. Body composition was assessed with a standardized protocol. Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured as oxygen consumption during an incremental treadmill exercise. Fasting blood samples were collected for blood chemistry assays including lipids, glucose, insulin and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), leptin, and adiponectin. Daily PA was measured with an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days, and they were classified as low-, moderate-, and vigorous-PA. Independent t-tests were used to compare mean differences in the measured variables between boys and girls. There were significant sex differences in Tanner scales, body mass index, percent body fat, and waist circumference (WC).
Girls had significantly higher values in Tanner scales (p < 0.001) and percent body fat (p < 0.001) than boys. Boys had significantly higher values in body mass index (p = 0.019) and waist circumference (p < 0.001) than girls. Boys also had significantly higher values in VO2max (p < 0.001) and low (p < 0.001), moderate (p < 0.001), and vigorous (p < 0.001) PAs. With respect to metabolic risk factors, girls had significantly higher serum levels of triglycerides (p = 0.005), insulin (p < 0.001), and HOMA-IR (p < 0.001) and significantly lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.015) than boys.
In summary, the current findings of the study showed that the increased risk for insulin resistance in girls over boys is associated with higher Tanner scale and percent body fat in conjunction with poor cardiorespiratory fitness and physical inactivity, suggesting that exercise intervention to promote physical activity and fitness is imperative for general health promotion of school children, with a special focus on girls.
对于生活方式因素在小学高年级儿童胰岛素抵抗性别差异中的潜在作用,人们了解甚少。
在这项横断面研究中,我们比较了12至13岁小学儿童(男孩69名,女孩81名)在坦纳分期、体脂、身体活动(PA)和体能以及胰岛素抵抗标志物方面的性别差异。采用标准化方案评估身体成分。通过递增式跑步机运动期间的耗氧量来测量心肺功能。采集空腹血样进行血液化学分析,包括血脂、血糖、胰岛素以及胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、瘦素和脂联素。使用加速度计连续7天测量每日PA,并将其分为低、中、高强度PA。采用独立t检验比较男孩和女孩在测量变量上的均值差异。在坦纳分期、体重指数、体脂百分比和腰围(WC)方面存在显著的性别差异。
女孩在坦纳分期(p < 0.001)和体脂百分比(p < 0.001)方面的值显著高于男孩。男孩在体重指数(p = 0.019)和腰围(p < 0.001)方面的值显著高于女孩。男孩在最大摄氧量(p < 0.001)以及低(p < 0.001)、中(p < 0.001)、高强度(p < 0.001)PA方面的值也显著更高。在代谢危险因素方面,女孩的血清甘油三酯(p = 0.005)、胰岛素(p < 0.001)和HOMA-IR(p < 0.001)水平显著高于男孩,而高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平(p = 0.015)显著低于男孩。
总之,该研究的当前结果表明,女孩相对于男孩胰岛素抵抗风险增加与较高的坦纳分期、体脂百分比以及心肺功能差和身体活动不足有关,这表明为促进学龄儿童的总体健康,进行运动干预以促进身体活动和体能至关重要,尤其要关注女孩。