Walker Elizabeth Reisinger, McGee Robin E, Druss Benjamin G
Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;72(4):334-41. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2502.
Despite the potential importance of understanding excess mortality among people with mental disorders, no comprehensive meta-analyses have been conducted quantifying mortality across mental disorders.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality among people with mental disorders and examine differences in mortality risks by type of death, diagnosis, and study characteristics.
We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and Web of Science from inception through May 7, 2014, including references of eligible articles. Our search strategy included terms for mental disorders (eg, mental disorders, serious mental illness, and severe mental illness), specific diagnoses (eg, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder), and mortality. We also used Google Scholar to identify articles that cited eligible articles.
English-language cohort studies that reported a mortality estimate of mental disorders compared with a general population or controls from the same study setting without mental illness were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and articles. Of 2481 studies identified, 203 articles met the eligibility criteria and represented 29 countries in 6 continents.
One reviewer conducted a full abstraction of all data, and 2 reviewers verified accuracy.
Mortality estimates (eg, standardized mortality ratios, relative risks, hazard ratios, odds ratios, and years of potential life lost) comparing people with mental disorders and the general population or people without mental disorders. We used random-effects meta-analysis models to pool mortality ratios for all, natural, and unnatural causes of death. We also examined years of potential life lost and estimated the population attributable risk of mortality due to mental disorders.
For all-cause mortality, the pooled relative risk of mortality among those with mental disorders (from 148 studies) was 2.22 (95% CI, 2.12-2.33). Of these, 135 studies revealed that mortality was significantly higher among people with mental disorders than among the comparison population. A total of 67.3% of deaths among people with mental disorders were due to natural causes, 17.5% to unnatural causes, and the remainder to other or unknown causes. The median years of potential life lost was 10 years (n = 24 studies). We estimate that 14.3% of deaths worldwide, or approximately 8 million deaths each year, are attributable to mental disorders.
These estimates suggest that mental disorders rank among the most substantial causes of death worldwide. Efforts to quantify and address the global burden of illness need to better consider the role of mental disorders in preventable mortality.
尽管了解精神障碍患者的超额死亡率具有潜在重要性,但尚未进行全面的荟萃分析来量化各类精神障碍的死亡率。
对精神障碍患者的死亡率进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并按死亡类型、诊断和研究特征检查死亡风险的差异。
我们检索了从创刊至2014年5月7日的EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsychINFO和Web of Science数据库,包括符合条件文章的参考文献。我们的检索策略包括精神障碍相关术语(如精神障碍、严重精神疾病和重度精神疾病)、特定诊断(如精神分裂症、抑郁症、焦虑症和双相情感障碍)以及死亡率。我们还使用谷歌学术来识别引用符合条件文章的文献。
纳入报告了精神障碍死亡率估计值,并与同一研究环境中的普通人群或无精神疾病的对照进行比较的英文队列研究。两名研究者独立审查标题、摘要和文章。在识别出的2481项研究中,203篇文章符合纳入标准,代表了六大洲的29个国家。
一名研究者对所有数据进行全面提取,两名研究者核实准确性。
比较精神障碍患者与普通人群或无精神障碍者的死亡率估计值(如标准化死亡比、相对风险、风险比、比值比和潜在寿命损失年数)。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析模型汇总所有、自然和非自然死亡原因的死亡率比值。我们还检查了潜在寿命损失年数,并估计了精神障碍导致的死亡的人群归因风险。
对于全因死亡率,精神障碍患者(来自148项研究)的汇总相对风险为2.