Suppr超能文献

体感空间注意调节激光诱发脑电的波幅、潜伏期及潜伏期抖动。

Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

作者信息

Franz Marcel, Nickel Moritz M, Ritter Alexander, Miltner Wolfgang H R, Weiss Thomas

机构信息

Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany;

Department of Neurology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2760-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00070.2015. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

Abstract

Several studies provided evidence that the amplitudes of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) are modulated by attention. However, previous reports were based on across-trial averaging of LEP responses at the expense of losing information about intertrial variability related to attentional modulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of somatosensory spatial attention on single-trial parameters (i.e., amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter) of LEP components (N2 and P2). Twelve subjects participated in a sustained spatial attention paradigm while noxious laser stimuli (left hand) and noxious electrical stimuli (right hand) were sequentially delivered to the dorsum of the respective hand with nonnoxious air puffs randomly interspersed within the sequence of noxious stimuli. Participants were instructed to mentally count all stimuli (i.e., noxious and nonnoxious) applied to the attended location. Laser stimuli, presented to the attended hand (ALS), elicited larger single-trial amplitudes of the N2 component compared with unattended laser stimuli (ULS). In contrast, single-trial amplitudes of the P2 component were not significantly affected by spatial attention. Single-trial latencies of the N2 and P2 were significantly smaller for ALS vs. ULS. Additionally, the across-trial latency jitter of the N2 component was reduced for ALS. Conversely, the latency jitter of the P2 component was smaller for ULS compared with ALS. With the use of single-trial analysis, the study provided new insights into brain dynamics of LEPs related to spatial attention. Our results indicate that single-trial parameters of LEP components are differentially modulated by spatial attention.

摘要

多项研究提供了证据表明,激光诱发电位(LEP)的波幅受注意力调节。然而,先前的报告基于LEP反应的跨试验平均,代价是丢失了与注意力调节相关的试验间变异性信息。本研究的目的是调查体感空间注意力对LEP成分(N2和P2)的单次试验参数(即波幅、潜伏期和潜伏期抖动)的影响。12名受试者参与了持续空间注意力范式,同时将有害激光刺激(左手)和有害电刺激(右手)依次施加到各自手部的背部,在有害刺激序列中随机穿插无害气吹。参与者被指示在心里数所有施加到被关注部位的刺激(即有害和无害刺激)。与未被关注的激光刺激(ULS)相比,施加到被关注手部的激光刺激(ALS)引发的N2成分单次试验波幅更大。相比之下,P2成分的单次试验波幅不受空间注意力的显著影响。与ULS相比,ALS的N2和P2单次试验潜伏期显著更短。此外,ALS的N2成分跨试验潜伏期抖动减小。相反,与ALS相比,ULS的P2成分潜伏期抖动更小。通过使用单次试验分析,本研究为与空间注意力相关的LEP脑动力学提供了新的见解。我们的结果表明,LEP成分的单次试验参数受空间注意力的差异调节。

相似文献

1
Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2760-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00070.2015. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
3
Automated single-trial measurement of amplitude and latency of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) using multiple linear regression.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1331-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.02.017. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
4
Single-trial averaging improves the physiological interpretation of contact heat evoked potentials.
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 15;225:117473. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117473. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Switching Between Pain and a Visual Illusion Task: A Laser Evoked Potential Study.
Brain Topogr. 2018 May;31(3):430-446. doi: 10.1007/s10548-017-0613-8. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
Pre-stimulus alpha power affects vertex N2-P2 potentials evoked by noxious stimuli.
Brain Res Bull. 2008 Mar 28;75(5):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
8
Evoked potentials to nociceptive stimuli delivered by CO2 or Nd:YAP lasers.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.021. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
10
Acute aerobic exercise enhances attentional modulation of somatosensory event-related potentials during a tactile discrimination task.
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Mar 15;281:267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.045. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupil dilation evoked by painful electrical stimulation is abolished during pain inhibition by distraction.
J Physiol Sci. 2025 May 16;75(2):100026. doi: 10.1016/j.jphyss.2025.100026.
2
Does movement preparation enhance attending to bodily sensations in the back in people with persistent low back pain?
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0300421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300421. eCollection 2024.
5
6
Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses.
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 12;7(2):e06188. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06188. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Integration of bilateral nociceptive inputs tunes spinal and cerebral responses.
Sci Rep. 2019 May 9;9(1):7143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43567-y.
8
Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Switching Between Pain and a Visual Illusion Task: A Laser Evoked Potential Study.
Brain Topogr. 2018 May;31(3):430-446. doi: 10.1007/s10548-017-0613-8. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
Intense pain influences the cortical processing of visual stimuli projected onto the sensitized skin.
Pain. 2017 Apr;158(4):691-697. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000816.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the acquisition of nociceptive evoked potentials without causing more pain.
Pain. 2013 Feb;154(2):235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
2
Interaction between stimulus intensity and perceptual load in the attentional control of pain.
Pain. 2013 Jan;154(1):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
5
How efficient is the orienting of spatial attention to pain? An experimental investigation.
Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1226-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.027. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
7
A comparative study of cortical responses evoked by transcutaneous electrical vs CO(2) laser stimulation.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;122(12):2482-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
8
The role of spatial attention in attentional control over pain: an experimental investigation.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jan;208(2):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2477-y. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
9
Gamma oscillations as a neuronal correlate of the attentional effects of pain.
Pain. 2010 Aug;150(2):302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
10
Low intensity intra-epidermal electrical stimulation can activate Aδ-nociceptors selectively.
Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 May 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验