Reig Ramon, Zerlaut Yann, Vergara Ramiro, Destexhe Alain, Sanchez-Vives Maria V
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Unité de Neurosciences, Information et Complexité, CNRS, 91198 Gif sur Yvette, France, and.
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 11;35(6):2689-702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2004-14.2015.
The cortical network recurrent circuitry generates spontaneous activity organized into Up (active) and Down (quiescent) states during slow-wave sleep or anesthesia. These different states of cortical activation gain modulate synaptic transmission. However, the reported modulation that Up states impose on synaptic inputs is disparate in the literature, including both increases and decreases of responsiveness. Here, we tested the hypothesis that such disparate observations may depend on the intensity of the stimulation. By means of intracellular recordings, we studied synaptic transmission during Up and Down states in rat auditory cortex in vivo. Synaptic potentials were evoked either by auditory or electrical (thalamocortical, intracortical) stimulation while randomly varying the intensity of the stimulus. Synaptic potentials evoked by the same stimulus intensity were compared in Up/Down states. Up states had a scaling effect on the stimulus-evoked synaptic responses: the amplitude of weaker responses was potentiated whereas that of larger responses was maintained or decreased with respect to the amplitude during Down states. We used a computational model to explore the potential mechanisms explaining this nontrivial stimulus-response relationship. During Up/Down states, there is different excitability in the network and the neuronal conductance varies. We demonstrate that the competition between presynaptic recruitment and the changing conductance might be the central mechanism explaining the experimentally observed stimulus-response relationships. We conclude that the effect that cortical network activation has on synaptic transmission is not constant but contingent on the strength of the stimulation, with a larger modulation for stimuli involving both thalamic and cortical networks.
在慢波睡眠或麻醉期间,皮质网络的循环回路会产生自发活动,这种活动组织成向上(活跃)和向下(静止)状态。皮质激活增益的这些不同状态会调节突触传递。然而,文献中报道的向上状态对突触输入的调节作用各不相同,包括反应性的增加和减少。在这里,我们测试了这样一种假设,即这些不同的观察结果可能取决于刺激的强度。通过细胞内记录,我们在大鼠听觉皮质体内研究了向上和向下状态期间的突触传递。在随机改变刺激强度的同时,通过听觉或电刺激(丘脑皮质、皮质内)诱发突触电位。比较了在向上/向下状态下由相同刺激强度诱发的突触电位。向上状态对刺激诱发的突触反应具有缩放效应:较弱反应的幅度增强,而较大反应的幅度相对于向下状态时的幅度保持不变或减小。我们使用计算模型来探索解释这种复杂刺激-反应关系的潜在机制。在向上/向下状态期间,网络中的兴奋性不同,神经元电导也会发生变化。我们证明,突触前募集与变化的电导之间的竞争可能是解释实验观察到的刺激-反应关系的核心机制。我们得出结论,皮质网络激活对突触传递的影响不是恒定的,而是取决于刺激的强度,对于涉及丘脑和皮质网络的刺激,调节作用更大。