Balasubramanian Madhan, Spencer A John, Short Stephanie D, Watkins Keith, Chrisopoulos Sergio, Brennan David S
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Discipline of Behavioural & Social Sciences in Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Int Dent J. 2015 Jun;65(3):146-55. doi: 10.1111/idj.12154. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
Migrants comprise a growing proportion of the dental workforce in Australia. To date, research on migrant dentists is limited, raising policy questions regarding the motivations for migration, demographic profiles and work patterns. The purpose of this paper was to present findings from the first national survey of migrant dentists in Australia.
All dentists with a primary dental qualification from an overseas institution and registered with the Australian Dental Association (n=1,872) or enrolled as a graduate student in any of the nine dental schools in Australia (n=105) were surveyed between January and May 2013.
A total of 1,022 participants (response rate=54.5%) were classifiable into three migrant dentist groups: direct recognition (n=491); Australian Dental Council (ADC) (n=411); and alternative pathway (n=120). Overall, 41.8% of migrant dentists were female. More than half of the ADC group (54.1%) were from lower middle income countries. The most frequent motivation for migration according to the direct recognition group (21.1%) was 'adventure', whereas other groups migrated for 'better opportunity'. The majority of ADC respondents (65%) were under 45 years of age, and a larger proportion worked in the most disadvantaged areas (12.4%), compared with other groups. Gender, marital status, years since arrival in Australia and having children varied between the groups (chi square; P<0.05).
Dentist groups migrate to Australia for different reasons. The large proportion of the migrant dentist workforce sourced from lower middle income countries points towards deficiencies in oral health systems both for these countries and for Australia. The feminisation of the migrant dentist profile could in future affect dentist-practice activity patterns in Australia. Further research, especially on the settlement experiences of these dentists, can provide better insights into issues faced by these dentists, the nature of support that migrant dentists receive in Australia, the probable future patterns of work and potential impact on the dental workforce and dental service provision.
在澳大利亚,移民在牙科劳动力中所占比例日益增加。迄今为止,关于移民牙医的研究有限,这引发了有关移民动机、人口概况和工作模式的政策问题。本文的目的是呈现澳大利亚首次全国性移民牙医调查的结果。
2013年1月至5月期间,对所有拥有海外机构颁发的初级牙科资格证书且在澳大利亚牙科协会注册(n = 1872)或在澳大利亚九所牙科学院之一注册为研究生(n = 105)的牙医进行了调查。
共有1022名参与者(回复率 = 54.5%)可分为三个移民牙医群体:直接认可(n = 491);澳大利亚牙科委员会(ADC)(n = 411);以及替代途径(n = 120)。总体而言,41.8%的移民牙医为女性。ADC群体中超过一半(54.1%)来自中低收入国家。直接认可群体中最常见的移民动机(21.1%)是“冒险”,而其他群体移民是为了“更好的机会”。大多数ADC受访者(65%)年龄在45岁以下,与其他群体相比,在最贫困地区工作的比例更大(12.4%)。各群体在性别、婚姻状况、抵达澳大利亚后的年数以及是否有子女方面存在差异(卡方检验;P < 0.05)。
不同牙医群体移民到澳大利亚的原因各不相同。来自中低收入国家的移民牙医劳动力占比很大,这表明这些国家和澳大利亚的口腔卫生系统都存在不足。移民牙医群体的女性化未来可能会影响澳大利亚牙医的执业活动模式。进一步的研究,特别是关于这些牙医的定居经历的研究,可以更好地洞察这些牙医面临的问题、澳大利亚移民牙医获得的支持的性质、未来可能的工作模式以及对牙科劳动力和牙科服务提供的潜在影响。