Anders Katherine L, Nga Le Hong, Thuy Nguyen Thi Van, Ngoc Tran Van, Tam Cao Thi, Tai Luong Thi Hue, Truong Nguyen Thanh, Duyen Huynh Thi Le, Trung Vu Tuan, Kien Duong Thi Hue, Wolbers Marcel, Wills Bridget, Chau Nguyen Van Vinh, Tho Nguyen Dac, Simmons Cameron P
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit-Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Centre for Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Preventive Medicine Centre, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Feb 13;9(2):e0003528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003528. eCollection 2015 Feb.
Dengue control programs commonly employ reactive insecticide spraying around houses of reported cases, with the assumption that most dengue virus (DENV) transmission occurs in the home. Focal household transmission has been demonstrated in rural settings, but it is unclear whether this holds true in dense and mobile urban populations. We conducted a prospective study of dengue clustering around households in highly urban Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
We enrolled 71 index cases with suspected dengue (subsequently classified as 52 dengue cases and 19 non-dengue controls); each initiated the enrollment of a cluster of 25-35 household members and neighbors who were followed up over 14 days. Incident DENV infections in cluster participants were identified by RT-PCR, NS1-ELISA, and/or DENV-IgM/-IgG seroconversion, and recent infections by DENV-IgM positivity at baseline.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: There was no excess risk of DENV infection within dengue case clusters during the two-week follow-up, compared to control clusters, but the prevalence of recent DENV infection at baseline was two-fold higher in case clusters than controls (OR 2.3, 95%CI 1.0-5.1, p = 0.05). Prevalence of DENV infection in Aedes aegypti was similar in case and control houses, and low overall (1%). Our findings are broadly consistent with household clustering of dengue risk, but indicate that any clustering is at a short temporal scale rather than sustained chains of localized transmission. This suggests that reactive perifocal insecticide spraying may have a limited impact in this setting.
登革热防控项目通常在报告病例的房屋周围进行反应性杀虫剂喷洒,其假设是大多数登革热病毒(DENV)传播发生在家庭中。在农村地区已证实存在家庭聚集性传播,但在人口密集且流动性大的城市人群中是否如此尚不清楚。我们在越南胡志明市高度城市化地区对家庭周围的登革热聚集情况进行了一项前瞻性研究。
我们纳入了71例疑似登革热的索引病例(随后分类为52例登革热病例和19例非登革热对照);每例索引病例开始招募一组25 - 35名家庭成员和邻居,对其进行为期14天的随访。通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)、NS1酶联免疫吸附测定(NS1-ELISA)和/或DENV-IgM/-IgG血清转化来确定聚集人群中的新发DENV感染,并通过基线时DENV-IgM阳性来确定近期感染情况。
主要发现/结论:与对照聚集组相比,在为期两周的随访期间,登革热病例聚集组内DENV感染的额外风险并不存在,但病例聚集组基线时近期DENV感染的患病率是对照组的两倍(比值比2.3,95%置信区间1.0 - 5.1,p = 0.05)。埃及伊蚊中DENV感染的患病率在病例组和对照组房屋中相似,总体较低(1%)。我们的研究结果与登革热风险的家庭聚集情况大致一致,但表明任何聚集都处于较短的时间尺度,而非持续的局部传播链。这表明在这种情况下,反应性的病灶周围杀虫剂喷洒可能影响有限。