Suppr超能文献

豚鼠中肉桂醛、肉桂醇和肉桂酸之间的交叉致敏模式。

Cross-sensitization patterns in guinea pigs between cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamic acid.

作者信息

Weibel H, Hansen J, Andersen K E

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Research and Development Department, Pharmacia AS, Hillerød, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(4):302-7.

PMID:2568047
Abstract

Guinea pig maximization tests (GPMT) were performed with cinnamon substances. There was a certain degree of cross-reactivity between cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamic acid as animals sensitized to cinnamaldehyde reacted to the challenge with the three substances. Animals sensitized to cinnamyl alcohol reacted to cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamaldehyde, but not to cinnamic acid. Cinnamic acid did not sensitize guinea pigs. Compared to the challenge concentration for cinnamaldehyde, approximately a 15 times higher concentration of cinnamyl alcohol and a 25 times higher concentration of cinnamic acid were required to give positive reactions in animals sensitized to cinnamaldehyde. This could not be explained by differences in permeability properties, as the penetration profiles of the three substances through guinea pig skin in vitro showed permeability coefficients of the same order of magnitude under the test conditions. The study suggests that cinnamaldehyde is the "true" allergen, while cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamic acid are transformed in the skin to cinnamaldehyde, before contact allergic reactions can occur.

摘要

用肉桂物质进行了豚鼠最大化试验(GPMT)。肉桂醛、肉桂醇和肉桂酸之间存在一定程度的交叉反应,因为对肉桂醛致敏的动物对这三种物质的激发均有反应。对肉桂醇致敏的动物对肉桂醇和肉桂醛有反应,但对肉桂酸无反应。肉桂酸不会使豚鼠致敏。与肉桂醛的激发浓度相比,对肉桂醛致敏的动物要产生阳性反应,所需肉桂醇的浓度大约高15倍,肉桂酸的浓度大约高25倍。这无法用渗透特性的差异来解释,因为在测试条件下,这三种物质通过豚鼠皮肤的体外渗透曲线显示其渗透系数处于同一数量级。该研究表明,肉桂醛是“真正的”过敏原,而肉桂醇和肉桂酸在皮肤中会先转化为肉桂醛,然后才会发生接触性过敏反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验