Dikaios Nikolaos, Alkalbani Jokha, Abd-Alazeez Mohamed, Sidhu Harbir Singh, Kirkham Alex, Ahmed Hashim U, Emberton Mark, Freeman Alex, Halligan Steve, Taylor Stuart, Atkinson David, Punwani Shonit
Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Level 3 East, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
Eur Radiol. 2015 Sep;25(9):2727-37. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3636-0. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
To assess the interchangeability of zone-specific (peripheral-zone (PZ) and transition-zone (TZ)) multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) logistic-regression (LR) models for classification of prostate cancer.
Two hundred and thirty-one patients (70 TZ training-cohort; 76 PZ training-cohort; 85 TZ temporal validation-cohort) underwent mp-MRI and transperineal-template-prostate-mapping biopsy. PZ and TZ uni/multi-variate mp-MRI LR-models for classification of significant cancer (any cancer-core-length (CCL) with Gleason > 3 + 3 or any grade with CCL ≥ 4 mm) were derived from the respective cohorts and validated within the same zone by leave-one-out analysis. Inter-zonal performance was tested by applying TZ models to the PZ training-cohort and vice-versa. Classification performance of TZ models for TZ cancer was further assessed in the TZ validation-cohort. ROC area-under-curve (ROC-AUC) analysis was used to compare models.
The univariate parameters with the best classification performance were the normalised T2 signal (T2nSI) within the TZ (ROC-AUC = 0.77) and normalized early contrast-enhanced T1 signal (DCE-nSI) within the PZ (ROC-AUC = 0.79). Performance was not significantly improved by bi-variate/tri-variate modelling. PZ models that contained DCE-nSI performed poorly in classification of TZ cancer. The TZ model based solely on maximum-enhancement poorly classified PZ cancer.
LR-models dependent on DCE-MRI parameters alone are not interchangable between prostatic zones; however, models based exclusively on T2 and/or ADC are more robust for inter-zonal application.
• The ADC and T2-nSI of benign/cancer PZ are higher than benign/cancer TZ. • DCE parameters are significantly different between benign PZ and TZ, but not between cancerous PZ and TZ. • Diagnostic models containing contrast enhancement parameters have reduced performance when applied across zones.
评估前列腺癌分类中特定区域(外周区(PZ)和移行区(TZ))多参数磁共振成像(mp-MRI)逻辑回归(LR)模型的互换性。
231例患者(70例TZ训练队列;76例PZ训练队列;85例TZ时间验证队列)接受了mp-MRI和经会阴模板前列腺映射活检。用于显著癌症(任何癌芯长度(CCL)且Gleason评分>3+3或任何分级且CCL≥4mm)分类的PZ和TZ单变量/多变量mp-MRI LR模型分别来自各自队列,并通过留一法分析在同一区域内进行验证。通过将TZ模型应用于PZ训练队列,反之亦然,来测试区域间性能。在TZ验证队列中进一步评估TZ模型对TZ癌症的分类性能。采用ROC曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)分析比较模型。
分类性能最佳的单变量参数是TZ内的归一化T2信号(T2nSI)(ROC-AUC=0.77)和PZ内的归一化早期对比增强T1信号(DCE-nSI)(ROC-AUC=0.79)。双变量/三变量建模未显著提高性能。包含DCE-nSI的PZ模型在TZ癌症分类中表现不佳。仅基于最大增强的TZ模型对PZ癌症分类不佳。
仅依赖DCE-MRI参数的LR模型在前列腺区域之间不可互换;然而,仅基于T2和/或ADC的模型在区域间应用时更稳健。
•良性/癌性PZ的ADC和T2-nSI高于良性/癌性TZ。•良性PZ和TZ之间的DCE参数有显著差异,但癌性PZ和TZ之间无显著差异。•包含对比增强参数的诊断模型在跨区域应用时性能降低。