Lucet Jean-Christophe, Abiteboul Dominique, Estellat Candice, Roy Carine, Chollet-Martin Sylvie, Tubach Florence, Carcelain Guislaine
1AP-HP,Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital,Infection Control Unit,F-75018 Paris,France.
3AP-HP,Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital,Department of Occupational Health,F-75018 Paris,France.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 May;36(5):569-74. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.19. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
Healthcare workers (HCWs), especially those caring for patients with tuberculosis (TB), are at high risk of acquiring that disease. The poor specificity of tuberculin skin testing (TST) prompted us to evaluate the effectiveness of the interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) in comparison with TST in a large prospective, multicenter, 1-year study of HCWs with occupational exposure to TB.
HCWs from high-risk units at 14 university hospitals were invited to participate and underwent both TST and IGRA (first Quantiferon TB Gold-IT®, QFT-G, then T-SPOT.TB® if QFT-G was indeterminate) at baseline and after 1 year. We collected demographic characteristics, country of birth, history of TB, immunosuppression, past exposure to TB, history of BCG vaccination, results of most recent TST, job category, and duration of current function.
Among 807 HCWs enrolled, current or past TST at baseline was positive (≥15 mm) in 282 (34.9%); the IGRA was positive in 113 (14.0%) and indeterminate in 3 (0.4%). After 1 year, 594 HCWs had both an IGRA and TST (or prior TST≥15 mm) at baseline and an IGRA and TST (if indicated). The conversion rate was 2.5% (9 of 367) with TST and 7.6% (45 of 594) with IGRA, with poor agreement between the 2 tests. Using only QFT-G, conversion (9.9%) and reversion (17.8%) rates were higher for baseline QFT-G positive quantitative values <1 IU/mL.
TST and the IGRA yielded discordant results. The value of IGRA in addition to TST remains undetermined; the two should be jointly interpreted in decision-making (clinical trial registration NCT00797836).
医护人员(HCWs),尤其是那些护理结核病(TB)患者的人员,感染该病的风险很高。结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)特异性较差,促使我们在一项针对有职业性接触结核病风险的医护人员的大型前瞻性、多中心、为期1年的研究中,评估γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRA)与TST相比的有效性。
邀请来自14所大学医院高风险科室的医护人员参与研究,并在基线时和1年后分别接受TST和IGRA检测(首先是结核感染T细胞检测(Quantiferon TB Gold-IT®,QFT-G),如果QFT-G结果不确定,则进行T-SPOT.TB®检测)。我们收集了人口统计学特征、出生国家、结核病病史、免疫抑制情况、既往接触结核病情况、卡介苗接种史、最近一次TST结果、工作类别以及当前工作时长。
在纳入的807名医护人员中,基线时当前或既往TST结果为阳性(≥15 mm)的有282人(34.9%);IGRA结果为阳性的有113人(14.0%),结果不确定的有3人(0.4%)。1年后,594名医护人员在基线时同时进行了IGRA和TST检测(或既往TST≥15 mm),并且在需要时再次进行了IGRA和TST检测。TST的转化率为2.5%(367人中的9人),IGRA的转化率为7.6%(594人中的45人),两种检测方法之间的一致性较差。仅使用QFT-G时,基线QFT-G阳性定量值<1 IU/mL时的转化率(9.9%)和逆转率(17.8%)更高。
TST和IGRA得出了不一致的结果。IGRA相对于TST的价值仍未确定;在决策过程中应联合解读这两种检测结果(临床试验注册号NCT00797836)。