Highton-Williamson Elizabeth, Barnicot Kirsten, Kareem Tarrannum, Priebe Stefan
From the *Unit of Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London; †Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London; and ‡Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Apr;35(2):120-7. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000276.
Financial incentives for medication adherence in patients with psychotic disorders are controversial. It is not yet known whether fears expressed by clinicians are borne out in reality. We aimed to explore community mental health clinicians' experiences of the consequences of giving patients with psychotic disorders a financial incentive to take their depot medication. We implemented descriptive and thematic analyses of semistructured interviews with the clinicians of patients assigned to receive incentives within a randomized controlled trial. Fifty-nine clinicians were interviewed with regard to the effect of the incentives on 73 of the 78 patients allocated to receive incentives in the trial. Most commonly, the clinicians reported benefits for clinical management including improved adherence, contact, patient monitoring, communication, and trust (n = 52). Positive effects on symptoms, insight, or social functioning were reported for some (n = 33). Less commonly, problems for patient management were reported (n = 19) such as monetarization of the therapeutic relationship or negative consequences for the patient (n = 15) such as increased drug and alcohol use. Where requests for increased money occurred, they were rapidly resolved. It seems that, in most cases, the clinicians found that using incentives led to benefits for patient management and for patient health. However, in 33% of cases, some adverse effects were reported. It remains unclear whether certain clinical characteristics are associated with increased risk for adverse effects of financial incentives. The likelihood of benefit versus the smaller risk for adverse effects should be weighed up when deciding whether to offer incentives to individual patients.
针对精神病患者坚持服药给予经济激励存在争议。目前尚不清楚临床医生所表达的担忧是否在现实中得到证实。我们旨在探讨社区心理健康临床医生对于给予精神病患者经济激励以使其接受长效药物治疗所产生后果的经历。在一项随机对照试验中,我们对分配接受激励措施的患者的临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,并实施了描述性和主题分析。就激励措施对试验中分配接受激励的78名患者中的73名患者的影响,我们采访了59名临床医生。临床医生最常报告的是对临床管理的益处,包括提高服药依从性、增加接触、加强患者监测、改善沟通以及增强信任(n = 52)。一些临床医生报告了对症状、洞察力或社会功能的积极影响(n = 33)。较少有临床医生报告患者管理方面的问题(n = 19),例如治疗关系货币化,或者对患者产生负面影响(n = 15),如药物和酒精使用增加。当出现增加金钱奖励的请求时,这些请求会迅速得到解决。在大多数情况下,临床医生似乎发现使用激励措施对患者管理和患者健康都有好处。然而,在33%的案例中,报告了一些不良影响。目前尚不清楚某些临床特征是否与经济激励产生不良影响的风险增加有关。在决定是否对个体患者提供激励措施时,应权衡获益的可能性与较小的不良影响风险。