Suppr超能文献

3、5、11根针:探寻最佳针数——一项随机对照研究。

3,5,11 needles: looking for the perfect number of needles--a randomized and controlled study.

作者信息

Ceccherelli Francesco, Marino Elena, Caliendo Antonio, Dezzoni Rossana, Roveri Antonella, Gagliardi Giuseppe

出版信息

Acupunct Electrother Res. 2014;39(3-4):241-58. doi: 10.3727/036012914x14109544776097.

Abstract

Acupuncture has been successfully used in myofascial pain syndromes. However, the number of needles used, i.e. the "dose" of acupuncture stimulation, to obtain the best antinociceptive efficacy, is still a matter of debate. The question was addressed comparing the clinical efficacy of 3 different therapeutic schemes, mainly characterized by different numbers of needles used on 90 patients affected by a painful cervical myofascial syndrome. Patients were divided into 3 groups; the first group of 30 patients was treated with 11 needles, the second group of 30 patients was treated with 5 needles and the third group of 30 patients was treated with 3 needles. Each group underwent eight cycles of somatic acupuncture. In each session and in each group, all needles were stimulated until the pain tolerance threshold was reached; "pain tolerance is the amount of pain a person can handle without breaking down, either physically or emotionally". Pain intensity was evaluated before therapy, immediately after, and at 1 and 3 months follow-up by means of both the Mc Gill Pain Questionnaire and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Pain and the repercussion of pain on the patient's quality of life (DOPE- Descriptors Of Pain Effects) were also measured using a test we developed, administered at each session. In all groups, needles were inserted superficially, except for the two most painful trigger points that were deeply inserted. All groups, independently from the number of needles used, obtained a good and significant therapeutic effect without clinically relevant differences among groups. For this pathology and patients of this kind, the number of needles, 3 or 5 or 11, seems not to be an important variable in determining the therapeutic effect.

摘要

针刺疗法已成功应用于肌筋膜疼痛综合征。然而,为获得最佳的抗伤害感受疗效而使用的针数,即针刺刺激的“剂量”,仍是一个有争议的问题。本研究通过比较三种不同治疗方案的临床疗效来探讨这一问题,这三种方案的主要区别在于对90例患有颈部肌筋膜疼痛综合征的患者使用的针数不同。患者被分为三组;第一组30例患者用11根针治疗,第二组30例患者用5根针治疗,第三组30例患者用3根针治疗。每组均接受八个周期的体针治疗。在每次治疗过程中及每组中,所有的针都被刺激直至达到疼痛耐受阈值;“疼痛耐受是指一个人在身体或情绪上不崩溃的情况下所能承受的疼痛量”。通过麦吉尔疼痛问卷和视觉模拟量表(VAS)在治疗前、治疗后即刻以及随访1个月和3个月时评估疼痛强度。还使用我们开发的一项测试在每次治疗时测量疼痛以及疼痛对患者生活质量的影响(疼痛效应描述量表-DOPE)。在所有组中,除了两个最疼痛的触发点进行深刺外,其余针均浅刺。所有组,无论使用的针数多少,均获得了良好且显著的治疗效果,组间无临床相关差异。对于这种病理情况及此类患者,针数3根、5根或11根似乎不是决定治疗效果的重要变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验