Khattab Tarek Z, Hajeer Mohammad Y, Farah Hassan, Al-Sabbagh Rabab
PhD Student, Department of Orthodontics, University of Al-Baath Dental School, Hamah, Syrian Arab Republic.
Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):561-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1579.
No randomized controlled trial has tried to compare transverse dental arch changes between the lingual and labial orthodontic fixed appliances in the early stage of treatment.
To compare upper dental arch changes between lingual and labial fixed orthodontic appliances after leveling and alignment.
DESIGN, SETTING: Parallel-groups randomized controlled trial on patients with class I moderate crowding teeth treated at the University of Al-Baath Dental School in Hamah, Syria.
About 102 patients with crowded teeth and class I malocclusion were evaluated and 58 patients fulflled the inclusion criteria. Randomization was performed using computer generated tables; allocation was concealed using sequentially numbered opaque and sealed envelopes. About 52 participants were analyzed (mean age 21.5 ± 3.2 years). They were randomly distributed into two groups with 26 patients in each (1:1 allocation ratio).
Lingual vs labial fixed orthodontic appliances were used.
Intercanine width, interpremolar width, intermolar width, and arch length were measured on study models before brackets' placement (T1), at the end of leveling and alignment stage (T2).
Statistically significant increase was detected in the intercanine width in the lingual group (1.99 mm, p < 0.001) and in the labial group (1.22 mm, p < 0.001). The interpremolar width had a significant decrease in the lingual group (-0.70 mm, p < 0.001), whereas there was a significant increase in this width in the labial group (1.73 mm, p < 0.001). A significant decrease in intermolar width was detected in the lingual group (-0.79 mm, p < 0.001) whereas a significant increase was observed in the labial group (0.81 mm, p < 0.001). The differences between the two groups were significant for all comparisons (p < 0.001).
The labial appliance produced a significant increase in all horizontal transverse arch dimensions, whereas in the lingual appliance group the intercanine width increased significantly in conjunction with a significant narrowing of posterior segments.
The University of Al-Baath Postgraduate Research Budget (UBDS-00786223-PG).
尚无随机对照试验在治疗早期比较舌侧和唇侧正畸固定矫治器对牙弓横向变化的影响。
比较整平排齐后舌侧和唇侧固定正畸矫治器对上颌牙弓变化的影响。
设计、地点:在叙利亚哈马的阿尔-巴阿特大学牙科学院对I类中度牙列拥挤患者进行的平行组随机对照试验。
对约102例牙列拥挤和I类错牙合患者进行评估,58例符合纳入标准。使用计算机生成的表格进行随机分组;采用连续编号的不透明密封信封进行分配隐藏。对约52名参与者进行分析(平均年龄21.5±3.2岁)。他们被随机分为两组,每组26例(分配比例为1:1)。
使用舌侧与唇侧固定正畸矫治器。
在粘接托槽前(T1)、整平排齐阶段结束时(T2),在研究模型上测量尖牙间宽度、前磨牙间宽度、磨牙间宽度和牙弓长度。
舌侧组尖牙间宽度有统计学意义的增加(1.99 mm,p<0.001),唇侧组也有增加(1.22 mm,p<0.001)。舌侧组前磨牙间宽度有显著减小(-0.70 mm,p<0.001),而唇侧组该宽度有显著增加(1.73 mm,p<0.001)。舌侧组磨牙间宽度有显著减小(-0.79 mm,p<0.001),而唇侧组有显著增加(0.81 mm,p<0.001)。两组间所有比较的差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。
唇侧矫治器使所有水平横向牙弓尺寸显著增加,而舌侧矫治器组尖牙间宽度显著增加,同时后段显著变窄。
阿尔-巴阿特大学研究生研究预算(UBDS-00786223-PG)。