Sandoval Yader, Brilakis Emmanouil S, Canoniero Mariana, Yannopoulos Demetris, Garcia Santiago
Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):366. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0366-1.
The treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in need of a revascularization procedure is influenced by the clinical situation (stable vs. unstable), comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus), and anatomical variables (proximal left anterior artery stenosis, left ventricular dysfunction). Given the invasive nature of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations, surgeons have embraced the concept of complete anatomical revascularization in one procedural stage since the inception of CABG surgery. However, achieving complete coronary revascularization has been more challenging with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and as a result, incomplete procedures are far more common than complete ones. Data continue to emerge on the potential benefits of complete revascularization on clinical outcomes and suggest that complete revascularization should be the goal of therapy whenever possible. The heart team should carefully review the degree to which each revascularization modality can achieve this goal during procedural planning.
对于需要进行血运重建术的多支冠状动脉疾病患者,其治疗会受到临床情况(稳定型与不稳定型)、合并症(糖尿病)以及解剖学变量(左前降支近端狭窄、左心室功能障碍)的影响。鉴于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)操作具有侵入性,自CABG手术开展以来,外科医生就接受了在一个手术阶段实现完全解剖学血运重建的理念。然而,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)要实现完全冠状动脉血运重建更具挑战性,因此,不完全手术远比完全手术常见。关于完全血运重建对临床结局潜在益处的数据不断涌现,这表明只要有可能,完全血运重建就应成为治疗目标。心脏团队在手术规划期间应仔细评估每种血运重建方式能够实现这一目标的程度。