Costa Solange Alves da Silva, Paula Olívia Ferreira Pereira de, Silva Célia Regina Gonçalves E, Leão Mariella Vieira Pereira, Santos Silvana Soléo Ferreira dos
Department of Dentistry, Universidade de Taubaté, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
Department of Biology, Universidade de Taubaté, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2015;29. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0038. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
The instruments and materials used in health establishments are frequently exposed to microorganism contamination, and chemical products are used before sterilization to reduce occupational infection. We evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness, physical stability, and corrosiveness of two commercial formulations of peracetic acid on experimentally contaminated specimens. Stainless steel specimens were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, blood, and saliva and then immersed in a ready peracetic acid solution: 2% Sekusept Aktiv (SA) or 0.25% Proxitane Alpha (PA), for different times. Then, washes of these instruments were plated in culture medium and colony-forming units counted. This procedure was repeated six times per day over 24 non-consecutive days. The corrosion capacity was assessed with the mass loss test, and the concentration of peracetic acid and pH of the solutions were measured with indicator tapes. Both SA and PA significantly eliminated microorganisms; however, the SA solution was stable for only 4 days, whereas PA remained stable throughout the experiment. The concentration of peracetic acid in the SA solutions decreased over time until the chemical was undetectable, although the pH remained at 5. The PA solution had a concentration of 500-400 mg/L and a pH of 2-3. Neither formulation induced corrosion and both reduced the number of microorganisms (p = 0.0001). However, the differences observed in the performance of each product highlight the necessity of establishing a protocol for optimizing the use of each one.
医疗机构中使用的器械和材料经常受到微生物污染,在灭菌前会使用化学产品以减少职业感染。我们评估了两种市售过氧乙酸制剂对实验污染标本的抗菌效果、物理稳定性和腐蚀性。将不锈钢标本用金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌、白色念珠菌、血液和唾液污染,然后浸入即用型过氧乙酸溶液中:2%的Sekusept Aktiv(SA)或0.25%的Proxitane Alpha(PA),浸泡不同时间。然后,将这些器械的冲洗液接种于培养基中并计数菌落形成单位。在24个非连续的日子里,每天重复这个过程6次。通过质量损失试验评估腐蚀能力,并用指示带测量过氧乙酸的浓度和溶液的pH值。SA和PA都能显著消除微生物;然而,SA溶液仅在4天内保持稳定,而PA在整个实验过程中都保持稳定。SA溶液中过氧乙酸的浓度随时间下降,直到检测不到该化学物质,尽管pH值保持在5。PA溶液的浓度为500 - 400 mg/L,pH值为2 - 3。两种制剂均未引起腐蚀,且都减少了微生物数量(p = 0.0001)。然而,每种产品性能上的差异凸显了制定优化每种产品使用方案的必要性。