Corley Elizabeth A, Kim Youngjae, Scheufele Dietram A
School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, 411 N. Central Avenue, Suite 450, Mail Code 3720, Phoenix, AZ, 85004-0687, USA.
John E. Ross Professor, Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 309 Hiram Smith Hall, 1545 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, 53706-1215, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):111-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
Scientists' sense of social responsibility is particularly relevant for emerging technologies. Since a regulatory vacuum can sometimes occur in the early stages of these technologies, individual scientists' social responsibility might be one of the most significant checks on the risks and negative consequences of this scientific research. In this article, we analyze data from a 2011 mail survey of leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore their perceptions the regarding social and ethical responsibilities for their nanotechnology research. Our analyses show that leading U.S. nanoscientists express a moderate level of social responsibility about their research. Yet, they have a strong sense of ethical obligation to protect laboratory workers (in both universities and industry) from unhealthy exposure to nanomaterials. We also find that there are significant differences in scientists' sense of social and ethical responsibility depending on their demographic characteristics, job affiliation, attention to media content, risk perceptions and benefit perceptions. We conclude with some implications for future research.
科学家的社会责任感对于新兴技术尤为重要。由于在这些技术的早期阶段有时会出现监管真空,个别科学家的社会责任可能是对这类科学研究的风险和负面后果最重要的制约因素之一。在本文中,我们分析了2011年对美国顶尖纳米科学家进行的邮件调查数据,以探讨他们对纳米技术研究的社会和伦理责任的看法。我们的分析表明,美国顶尖纳米科学家对其研究表达了适度的社会责任感。然而,他们有强烈的道德义务保护(大学和企业的)实验室工作人员免受纳米材料的有害暴露。我们还发现,科学家的社会和伦理责任感因其人口统计学特征、工作单位、对媒体内容的关注、风险认知和利益认知而存在显著差异。我们最后提出了对未来研究的一些启示。