Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Clinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Mar;3(3):190-200. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00037-5. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
HIV-1 infection is associated with increased risk of tuberculosis and a safe and effective vaccine would assist control measures. We assessed the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine, modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A), in adults infected with HIV-1.
We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of MVA85A in adults infected with HIV-1, at two clinical sites, in Cape Town, South Africa and Dakar, Senegal. Eligible participants were aged 18-50 years, had no evidence of active tuberculosis, and had baseline CD4 counts greater than 350 cells per μL if they had never received antiretroviral therapy or greater than 300 cells per μL (and with undetectable viral load before randomisation) if they were receiving antiretroviral therapy; participants with latent tuberculosis infection were eligible if they had completed at least 5 months of isoniazid preventive therapy, unless they had completed treatment for tuberculosis disease within 3 years before randomisation. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) in blocks of four by randomly generated sequence to receive two intradermal injections of either MVA85A or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by antiretroviral therapy status and study site. Participants, nurses, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to group allocation. The second (booster) injection of MVA85A or placebo was given 6-12 months after the first vaccination. The primary study outcome was safety in all vaccinated participants (the safety analysis population). Safety was assessed throughout the trial as defined in the protocol. Secondary outcomes were immunogenicity and vaccine efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease, assessed in the per-protocol population. Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of participants at day 7 and day 28 after the first and second vaccination, and M tuberculosis infection and disease were assessed at the end of the study. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01151189.
Between Aug 4, 2011, and April 24, 2013, 650 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned; 649 were included in the safety analysis (324 in the MVA85A group and 325 in the placebo group) and 645 in the per-protocol analysis (320 and 325). 513 (71%) participants had CD4 counts greater than 300 cells per μL and were receiving antiretroviral therapy; 136 (21%) had CD4 counts above 350 cells per μL and had never received antiretroviral therapy. 277 (43%) had received isoniazid prophylaxis before enrolment. Solicited adverse events were more frequent in participants who received MVA85A (288 [89%]) than in those given placebo (235 [72%]). 34 serious adverse events were reported, 17 (5%) in each group. MVA85A induced a significant increase in antigen 85A-specific T-cell response, which peaked 7 days after both vaccinations and was primarily monofunctional. The number of participants with negative QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube findings at baseline who converted to positive by the end of the study was 38 (20%) of 186 in the MVA85A group and 40 (23%) of 173 in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 11·7% (95% CI -41·3 to 44·9). In the per-protocol population, six (2%) cases of tuberculosis disease occurred in the MVA85A group and nine (3%) occurred in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 32·8% (95% CI -111·5 to 80·3).
MVA85A was well tolerated and immunogenic in adults infected with HIV-1. However, we detected no efficacy against M tuberculosis infection or disease, although the study was underpowered to detect an effect against disease. Potential reasons for the absence of detectable efficacy in this trial include insufficient induction of a vaccine-induced immune response or the wrong type of vaccine-induced immune response, or both.
European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (IP.2007.32080.002), Aeras, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Oxford-Emergent Tuberculosis Consortium.
HIV-1 感染会增加患结核病的风险,而安全有效的疫苗将有助于控制措施。我们评估了候选结核病疫苗改良安卡拉痘苗病毒(MVA85A)在感染 HIV-1 的成年人中的安全性、免疫原性和疗效。
我们在南非开普敦和塞内加尔达喀尔的两个临床地点进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、2 期试验,评估了 MVA85A 在感染 HIV-1 的成年人中的安全性、免疫原性和疗效。符合条件的参与者年龄在 18-50 岁之间,没有活动性结核病的证据,并且如果从未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗,则基线 CD4 计数大于 350 个细胞/μL;如果正在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,则 CD4 计数大于 300 个细胞/μL(且在随机分组前病毒载量无法检测);如果已完成至少 5 个月的异烟肼预防性治疗,则有潜伏性结核感染的参与者有资格参加,如果在随机分组前 3 年内已完成结核病治疗,则不符合条件。参与者按照 1:1 的比例按随机生成的序列分为 4 个组,接受两次皮内注射 MVA85A 或安慰剂。根据抗逆转录病毒治疗状况和研究地点对分组进行分层。参与者、护士、研究人员和实验室工作人员对分组情况不知情。第二次(加强)MVA85A 或安慰剂注射在第一次接种后 6-12 个月进行。主要研究结果是所有接种参与者的安全性(安全性分析人群)。根据方案中的规定,在整个试验过程中评估安全性。次要结果是 M 结核感染和疾病的免疫原性和疫苗疗效,在方案人群中进行评估。在第一次和第二次接种后第 7 天和第 28 天,对部分参与者进行免疫原性评估,在研究结束时评估 M 结核感染和疾病。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01151189。
2011 年 8 月 4 日至 2013 年 4 月 24 日期间,共纳入 650 名参与者并进行了随机分组;649 名参与者纳入安全性分析(MVA85A 组 324 名,安慰剂组 325 名),645 名参与者纳入方案人群分析(MVA85A 组 320 名,安慰剂组 325 名)。513 名(71%)参与者的 CD4 计数大于 300 个细胞/μL,正在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗;136 名(21%)参与者的 CD4 计数高于 350 个细胞/μL,且从未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗。277 名(43%)参与者在入组前接受过异烟肼预防。接受 MVA85A 治疗的参与者(288 [89%])比接受安慰剂治疗的参与者(235 [72%])更常出现应征不良反应。报告了 34 例严重不良事件,每组各 17 例。MVA85A 诱导了抗原 85A 特异性 T 细胞应答的显著增加,该应答在两次接种后 7 天达到峰值,主要为单功能。在基线时使用 QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube 检测结果为阴性并在研究结束时转为阳性的参与者人数在 MVA85A 组为 38 名(20%),在安慰剂组为 40 名(23%),疫苗效力为 11.7%(95%CI -41.3 至 44.9)。在方案人群中,MVA85A 组有 6 例(2%)结核病病例,安慰剂组有 9 例(3%),疫苗效力为 32.8%(95%CI -111.5 至 80.3)。
MVA85A 在感染 HIV-1 的成年人中具有良好的耐受性和免疫原性。然而,我们没有检测到对 M 结核感染或疾病的疗效,尽管该研究的效力不足以检测对疾病的疗效。在这项试验中,检测到的疗效缺失可能有以下原因:疫苗诱导的免疫应答不足,或者疫苗诱导的免疫应答类型错误,或者两者兼而有之。
欧洲和发展中国家临床试验伙伴关系(IP.2007.32080.002)、Aeras、比尔和梅林达盖茨基金会、威康信托基金会和牛津新兴结核病联盟。