Bessa S S, Abdel-fattah M R, Al-Sayes I A, Korayem I T
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Al-Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt.
General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Midan Al-Khartoum, Mahatet Al-Raml, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hernia. 2015 Dec;19(6):909-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1360-y. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
The aim of this prospective study was to present a 10-year experience with the use of prosthetic mesh repair in the management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated groin hernias.
Patients with acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated groin hernias were treated by emergency repair of the hernia using a Prolene mesh. The presence of non-viable intestine necessitating resection-anastomosis of the bowel was not considered a contraindication to the use of mesh.
The present study included 234 patients. Their age ranged from 16 to 85 years with a mean of 55.9 ± 17.7 years. The hernia was indirect inguinal in 201 patients (85.9%), direct inguinal in 5 patients 5 (2.1%), hernia of canal of nuck in 13 patients (5.6%) and femoral in 15 patients (6.4%). Thirty patients (12.8%) had recurrent hernias. Resection-anastomosis of non-viable small intestine was performed in 32 patients (13.7%). There were 5 perioperative mortalities (2.1%). Complications were encountered in 41 patients (17.5%) and included wound infection in 14 patients (6%), scrotal hematoma in 9 patients (3.8%), chest infection in 8 patients (3.4%), deep vein thrombosis in 2 patients (0.9%), transient deterioration of liver function in 11 patients (4.7%) and mesh infection in 1 patient (0.5%). Follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 120 months with a mean of 62.5 ± 35.3 months. Two recurrences (0.9%) were encountered throughout the study period.
The use of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated groin hernias is safe. The presence of non-viable intestine cannot be regarded as a contraindication for prosthetic repair.
本前瞻性研究的目的是介绍使用人工补片修补术治疗急性嵌顿性和/或绞窄性腹股沟疝的10年经验。
急性嵌顿性和/或绞窄性腹股沟疝患者采用普理灵补片进行急诊疝修补术。需要进行肠切除吻合术的无活力肠管的存在不被视为使用补片的禁忌证。
本研究纳入234例患者。年龄范围为16至85岁,平均年龄为55.9±17.7岁。其中201例(85.9%)为腹股沟斜疝,5例(2.1%)为腹股沟直疝,13例(5.6%)为圆韧带囊肿疝,15例(6.4%)为股疝。30例(12.8%)为复发性疝。32例(13.7%)患者进行了无活力小肠的切除吻合术。围手术期死亡5例(2.1%)。41例(17.5%)患者出现并发症,包括伤口感染14例(6%)、阴囊血肿9例(3.8%)、肺部感染8例(3.4%)、深静脉血栓形成2例(0.9%)、肝功能短暂恶化11例(4.7%)和补片感染1例(0.5%)。随访时间为6至120个月,平均为62.5±35.3个月。整个研究期间有2例复发(0.9%)。
在急性嵌顿性和/或绞窄性腹股沟疝的急诊处理中使用人工补片修补术是安全的。存在无活力肠管不能被视为人工修补的禁忌证。