Suppr超能文献

青光眼患者使用新型滴眼液滴注装置的疗效与安全性评估。

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new device for eye drops instillation in patients with glaucoma.

作者信息

Junqueira Daniela M, Lopes Flavio S, de Souza Fabiola C, Dorairaj Syril, Prata Tiago S

机构信息

Glaucoma Unit, Hospital Medicina dos Olhos, Osasco, Brazil.

Glaucoma Unit, Hospital Medicina dos Olhos, Osasco, Brazil ; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 23;9:367-71. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S78743. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new device (Eyedrop(®)) designed for eye drop instillation in patients with and without glaucoma.

METHODS

This prospective study included consecutive patients with glaucoma and healthy participants. After a complete eye examination and determination of baseline intraocular pressure (IOP), topical hypotensive medication was introduced in both eyes, and the Eyedrop(®) delivery device (a plastic device in which the bottle with eye drops is inserted) was made available to all participants (with video and written instructions) for use in one eye, randomly chosen. In the second phase, all patients were evaluated by an experienced examiner for IOP determination, investigation of possible associated side effects, and ease of instilling eye drops (by a visual analog scale [VAS]; 0-10).

RESULTS

Thirty two participants (mean age 42.3±16.2 years) were evaluated. Of these, 44% had glaucoma. There was no significant difference in mean IOP variation when comparing the eye using (-3.9±2.9 mmHg) or not using the device (-3.3±2.6 mmHg; P=0.36). The subjective rating of the facility of drops instillation was significantly higher with the Eyedrop(®) applicator (VAS =7.6±1.6) than without it (VAS =6.2±1.8; P<0.01), with a higher frequency of positive device-related evaluations (VAS score >5) among participants without prior experience with eye drop instillation (78.6% [11/14]) versus those already experienced (66.7% [12/18]). No difference in the frequency of side effects or in the distribution pattern of fluorescein between eyes was observed (P≥0.63).

CONCLUSION

Eyedrop(®) received a better subjective response regarding the ease of instillation of hypotensive eye drops compared to traditional instillation, especially in patients with no previous experience with eye drops. Using the device did not result in any loss of hypotensive effect or increase in the frequency of side effects.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了一种专为青光眼患者和非青光眼患者滴眼设计的新装置(Eyedrop(®))的有效性和安全性。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了连续的青光眼患者和健康参与者。在进行全面的眼部检查并确定基线眼压(IOP)后,双眼均使用局部降压药物,然后向所有参与者(提供视频和书面说明)提供Eyedrop(®)给药装置(一种插入滴眼剂瓶的塑料装置),供其随机选择一只眼睛使用。在第二阶段,由经验丰富的检查人员对所有患者进行眼压测定、调查可能的相关副作用以及滴眼的难易程度评估(通过视觉模拟量表[VAS];0 - 10)。

结果

共评估了32名参与者(平均年龄42.3±16.2岁)。其中,44%患有青光眼。比较使用该装置的眼睛(-3.9±2.9 mmHg)和未使用该装置的眼睛(-3.3±2.6 mmHg;P = 0.36),平均眼压变化无显著差异。使用Eyedrop(®)给药器滴眼的便利性主观评分(VAS = 7.6±1.6)显著高于未使用时(VAS = 6.2±1.8;P < 0.01),在没有滴眼经验的参与者中,与滴眼相关的积极评价(VAS评分>5)频率更高(78.6% [11/14]),而有滴眼经验的参与者中这一频率为66.7% [12/18]。未观察到副作用频率或两眼之间荧光素分布模式的差异(P≥0.63)。

结论

与传统滴眼方式相比,Eyedrop(®)在降压滴眼剂的滴注便利性方面获得了更好的主观反应,尤其是在没有滴眼经验的患者中。使用该装置不会导致降压效果丧失或副作用频率增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae5/4348048/bf7ead9bb4a3/opth-9-367Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验