Tsuno Kanami, Kawakami Norito, Tsutsumi Akizumi, Shimazu Akihito, Inoue Akiomi, Odagiri Yuko, Yoshikawa Toru, Haratani Takashi, Shimomitsu Teruichi, Kawachi Ichiro
Department of Hygiene, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan; Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 9;10(3):e0119435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119435. eCollection 2015.
Bullying in the workplace is an increasingly recognized threat to employee health. We sought to test three hypotheses related to the determinants of workplace bullying: power distance at work; safety climate; and frustration related to perceived social inequality. A questionnaire survey was administered to a nationally representative community-based sample of 5,000 residents in Japan aged 20-60 years. The questionnaire included questions about employment, occupation, company size, education, household income, and subjective social status (SSS). We inquired about both the witnessing and personal experience of workplace bullying during the past 30 days. Among 2,384 respondents, data were analyzed from 1,546 workers. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the social determinants of workplace bullying. Six percent and 15 percent of the total sample reported experiencing or witnessing workplace bullying, respectively. After adjusting for gender and age, temporary employees (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.45 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.03-5.85]), junior high school graduates (OR: 2.62 [95%CI: 1.01-6.79]), workers with lowest household income (OR: 4.13 [95%CI:1.58-10.8]), and workers in the lowest SSS stratum (OR: 4.21 [95%CI:1.66-10.7]) were at increased risk of experiencing workplace bullying. When all variables were entered simultaneously in the model, a significant inverse association was observed between higher SSS and experiencing bullying (p = 0.002). Similarly in terms of witnessing bullying; SSS was significantly inversely associated (p = 0.017) while temporary employees reported a significantly higher risk of witnessing bullying compared to permanent workers (OR: 2.25 [95%CI:1.04 to 4.87]). The significant association between SSS and experiencing/witnessing workplace bullying supports the frustration hypothesis. The power distance hypothesis was also partly supported by the finding that temporary employees experienced a higher prevalence of workplace bullying.
职场霸凌对员工健康构成的威胁日益受到关注。我们试图验证与职场霸凌决定因素相关的三个假设:工作中的权力距离;安全氛围;以及与感知到的社会不平等相关的挫折感。对日本全国具有代表性的20至60岁的5000名社区居民进行了问卷调查。问卷包括有关就业、职业、公司规模、教育程度、家庭收入和主观社会地位(SSS)的问题。我们询问了过去30天内职场霸凌的目睹情况和个人经历。在2384名受访者中,对1546名员工的数据进行了分析。采用多元逻辑回归分析来研究职场霸凌的社会决定因素。分别有6%和15%的总样本报告经历或目睹过职场霸凌。在对性别和年龄进行调整后,临时工(优势比[OR]:2.45[95%置信区间(CI)=1.03 - 5.85])、初中毕业生(OR:2.62[95%CI:1.01 - 6.79])、家庭收入最低的员工(OR:4.13[95%CI:1.58 - 10.8])以及SSS阶层最低的员工(OR:4.21[95%CI:1.66 - 10.7])经历职场霸凌的风险增加。当所有变量同时纳入模型时,观察到较高的SSS与经历霸凌之间存在显著的负相关(p = 0.002)。同样,在目睹霸凌方面;SSS与之显著负相关(p = 0.017),而临时工报告目睹霸凌的风险显著高于长期工(OR:2.25[95%CI:1.04至4.87])。SSS与经历/目睹职场霸凌之间的显著关联支持了挫折感假设。临时工职场霸凌患病率较高这一发现也部分支持了权力距离假设。