Adams Stephen P, Tsang Michael, Wright James M
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Medical Block C, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 12;2015(3):CD008226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008226.pub3.
This represents the first update of this review, which was published in 2012. Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.
Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of atorvastatin on serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides in individuals with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. The primary focus of this review was determination of the mean per cent change from baseline of LDL-cholesterol. Secondary objectives • To quantify the variability of effects of various doses of atorvastatin.• To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to December Week 2 2013), EMBASE (1980 to December Week 2 2013), Web of Science (1899 to December Week 2 2013) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to December Week 2 2013). We applied no language restrictions.
Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks.
Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included and extracted data. We collected information on withdrawals due to adverse effects from placebo-controlled trials.
In this update, we found an additional 42 trials and added them to the original 254 studies. The update consists of 296 trials that evaluated dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 38,817 participants. Included are 242 before-and-after trials and 54 placebo-controlled RCTs. Log dose-response data from both trial designs revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. The Summary of findings table 1 documents the effect of atorvastatin on LDL-cholesterol over the dose range of 10 to 80 mg/d, which is the range for which this systematic review acquired the greatest quantity of data. Over this range, blood LDL-cholesterol is decreased by 37.1% to 51.7% (Summary of findings table 1). The slope of dose-related effects on cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was similar for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but rosuvastatin is about three-fold more potent. Subgroup analyses suggested that the atorvastatin effect was greater in females than in males and was greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Risk of bias for the outcome of withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) was high, but the mostly unclear risk of bias was judged unlikely to affect lipid measurements. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were not statistically significantly different between atorvastatin and placebo groups in these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This update resulted in no change to the main conclusions of the review but significantly increases the strength of the evidence. Studies show that atorvastatin decreases blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in a linear dose-related manner over the commonly prescribed dose range. New findings include that atorvastatin is more than three-fold less potent than rosuvastatin, and that the cholesterol-lowering effects of atorvastatin are greater in females than in males and greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. This review update does not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because included trials were of short duration and adverse effects were not reported in 37% of placebo-controlled trials.
本综述首次发表于2012年,此次为首次更新。阿托伐他汀是全球处方量最广泛的药物之一,也是处方量最广泛的他汀类药物。因此,了解阿托伐他汀对血脂的剂量相关效应大小很重要。
主要目的是量化不同剂量阿托伐他汀对有或无心血管疾病证据个体的血清总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇和甘油三酯的影响。本综述的主要重点是测定LDL胆固醇相对于基线的平均变化百分比。次要目的:量化不同剂量阿托伐他汀效应的变异性;量化安慰剂对照随机对照试验(RCT)中因不良反应导致的撤药情况(WDAEs)。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(2013年第11期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2013年12月第2周)、EMBASE(1980年至2013年12月第2周)、科学引文索引(1899年至2013年12月第2周)和生物学文摘数据库(1969年至2013年12月第2周)。我们未设语言限制。
评估不同固定剂量阿托伐他汀在3至12周内对血脂的剂量反应的随机对照试验和非对照前后对照试验。
两位综述作者独立评估纳入研究的资格标准并提取数据。我们收集了安慰剂对照试验中因不良反应导致的撤药信息。
在本次更新中,我们又发现了42项试验,并将其添加到原有的254项研究中。此次更新包含296项试验,评估了阿托伐他汀在38817名参与者中的剂量相关疗效。其中包括242项前后对照试验和54项安慰剂对照RCT。两种试验设计的对数剂量反应数据均显示,阿托伐他汀对血液总胆固醇、LDL胆固醇、HDL胆固醇和甘油三酯有线性剂量相关效应。“结果总结”表1记录了阿托伐他汀在10至80mg/d剂量范围内对LDL胆固醇的影响,这是本系统综述获得数据量最大的剂量范围。在此范围内,血液LDL胆固醇降低37.1%至51.7%(“结果总结”表1)。阿托伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀对胆固醇和LDL胆固醇的剂量相关效应斜率相似,但瑞舒伐他汀的效力约为阿托伐他汀的三倍。亚组分析表明,阿托伐他汀在女性中的效果大于男性,在非家族性高胆固醇血症中的效果大于家族性高胆固醇血症。因不良反应导致撤药(WDAEs)这一结果的偏倚风险较高,但大多不明确的偏倚风险被认为不太可能影响血脂测量。在这些短期试验中,阿托伐他汀组和安慰剂组因不良反应导致的撤药情况在统计学上无显著差异(风险比0.98,95%置信区间0.68至1.40)。
此次更新并未改变综述的主要结论,但显著增强了证据力度。研究表明,在常用处方剂量范围内,阿托伐他汀以线性剂量相关方式降低血液总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇。新发现包括,阿托伐他汀的效力比瑞舒伐他汀低三倍多,且阿托伐他汀在女性中的降胆固醇效果大于男性,在非家族性高胆固醇血症中的效果大于家族性高胆固醇血症。本综述更新并未很好地估计与阿托伐他汀相关的危害发生率,因为纳入试验的持续时间较短,且37%的安慰剂对照试验未报告不良反应。