Hare Hannah V, Bulte Daniel P
FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Feb;75(2):556-61. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25603. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
The calculation of the calibration parameter M, which represents the maximum theoretically possible blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase, is an essential intermediate step in any calibrated fMRI experiment. To better compare M values obtained across different studies, it is common to scale M values from their original BOLD echo time (TE) to a different echo time according to the theory that M is directly proportional to TE. To the best of our knowledge, this relationship has never been directly tested.
A pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling sequence with five readouts (TE ranging from 20 to 78 ms) was implemented to test the relationship between M and TE, both with and without the application of flow crushing gradients.
Both M and the BOLD signal were found to be linear functions of TE, but with a nonzero intercept. This intercept was reduced when crusher gradients were added, suggesting that the deviation from theory is a result of nonnegligible intravascular signal.
The linear scaling method introduces some error when comparing M values acquired with different BOLD echo times. However, this error is small compared with other considerations, and would generally not preclude the continued use of this scaling method.
校准参数M的计算是任何校准功能磁共振成像(fMRI)实验中必不可少的中间步骤,M代表理论上可能的最大血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号增加。为了更好地比较不同研究中获得的M值,根据M与回波时间(TE)成正比的理论,将M值从其原始BOLD回波时间缩放到不同的回波时间是很常见的。据我们所知,这种关系从未经过直接测试。
实施了一种具有五个读出值(TE范围为20至78毫秒)的伪连续动脉自旋标记序列,以测试M与TE之间的关系,包括应用和不应用血流粉碎梯度的情况。
发现M和BOLD信号均为TE的线性函数,但截距非零。添加粉碎梯度时,该截距减小,表明与理论的偏差是不可忽略的血管内信号的结果。
在比较不同BOLD回波时间获取的M值时,线性缩放方法会引入一些误差。然而,与其他因素相比,这种误差较小,通常不会妨碍继续使用这种缩放方法。