Poenaru Dan V, Popescu Mircea, Anglitoiu Bogdan, Popa Iulian, Andrei Diana, Birsasteanu Florin
2nd Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", Timisoara, Romania,
Int Orthop. 2015 May;39(5):961-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2727-5. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
Unstable pelvic ring disruptions have been associated with high rates of morbidity. Accurate reduction with fixation diminishes pain, permits early patient mobility, and allows the pelvic ring to improve functional outcome.
This was a retrospective study, whereby 30 polytrauma hospitalized patients were included, with unstable pelvic lesions stabilized with an external fixator as a mean of temporary or definitive fixation. Data collected for these sample were: age, sex, cause of trauma, type of pelvic lesion, associated lesions (ISS score), pelvic stabilization methods, and functional outcome. There were 17 male subjects (57%) and 13 female subjects (43%), with a mean age of 42.5 years (range 18-62 years). According to Tile classification, the unstable pelvic ring lesions prevailed; 60 % of patients were type C while three patients with type C instability had associated acetabular fractures, and 40% had type B rotational instability. Stabilization was achieved using an external fixator in 16 patients; in 14 patients the anterior ring fixation was used with an external fixator combined with posterior stabilization using percutaneous sacroiliac screws. The pelvic stabilization using the external fixator was later replaced with plates and screws (ORIF) in four patients. Follow-up at one, three, six and 12 months postoperatively was based on the Majeed functional score and radiographic assessment.
Eighteen patients (78%) had an excellent Majeed functional score, four patients had a good score, and only one patient had a fair functional outcome. Malunions were recorded in four patients with Tile C that were stabilized only by external fixation, and superficial pin track infection occurred in three patients. Within the studied group seven deaths have been recorded (23%) in patients with extremely severe associated injuries (ISS over 50), this being the decisive factor that determined the unfavourable evolution in six patients.
The external fixation stabilizes the anterior pelvic ring lesions and it can be combined with the posterior stabilization using percutaneous sacro-iliac screws in case of associated lesions of the posterior ring. The external fixator is very useful especially in the acute phase, acquiring an acceptable reduction and an adequate stability in the partially unstable lesions (Tile B) and also reduces the pelvic volume and bleeding, being considered essential within the resuscitation protocols. The external fixator can be used as a permanent stabilization method when it guarantees a satisfying reduction.
不稳定骨盆环损伤与高发病率相关。准确复位并固定可减轻疼痛,使患者早日活动,并改善骨盆环功能结局。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入30例因多发伤住院的患者,其不稳定骨盆损伤采用外固定器稳定,作为临时或确定性固定手段。收集这些样本的数据包括:年龄、性别、创伤原因、骨盆损伤类型、相关损伤(损伤严重度评分)、骨盆稳定方法及功能结局。有17例男性受试者(57%)和13例女性受试者(43%),平均年龄42.5岁(范围18 - 62岁)。根据Tile分类,不稳定骨盆环损伤占主导;60%的患者为C型,3例C型不稳定患者合并髋臼骨折,40%为B型旋转不稳定。16例患者采用外固定器实现稳定;14例患者采用前环固定,外固定器结合经皮骶髂螺钉进行后环稳定。4例患者后期将外固定器骨盆稳定方式更换为钢板螺钉(切开复位内固定)。术后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的随访基于Majeed功能评分和影像学评估。
18例患者(78%)Majeed功能评分优秀,4例患者评分良好,仅1例患者功能结局一般。4例仅采用外固定稳定的Tile C型患者出现畸形愈合,3例患者发生浅表针道感染。在研究组中,7例(23%)极重度相关损伤(损伤严重度评分超过50)患者死亡,这是6例患者病情进展不利的决定性因素。
外固定可稳定骨盆前环损伤,对于后环相关损伤,可结合经皮骶髂螺钉进行后环稳定。外固定器非常有用,尤其在急性期,对于部分不稳定损伤(Tile B型)可获得可接受的复位和足够的稳定性,还可减少骨盆容积和出血,在复苏方案中被视为必不可少。当外固定器能保证满意复位时,可作为永久稳定方法使用。