Beynon-Jones Siân M
Department of Sociology, Science and Technology Studies Unit, University of York, UK.
Sociology. 2013 Jun 1;47(3):509-525. doi: 10.1177/0038038512453797.
This article illustrates how Scottish health professionals involved in contemporary abortion provision construct stratified expectations about women's reproductive decision-making. Drawing on 42 semi-structured interviews I reveal the contingent discourses through which health professionals constitute the 'rationality' of the female subject who requests abortion. Specifically, I illustrate how youth, age, parity and class are mobilised as criteria through which to distinguish 'types' of patient whose requests for abortion are deemed particularly understandable or particularly problematic. I conceptualise this process of differentiation as a form of 'stratified reproduction' (Colen, 1995; Ginsburg and Rapp, 1995) and argue that it is significant for two reasons. Firstly, it illustrates the operation of dominant discourses concerning abortion and motherhood in twenty-first century Britain. Secondly, it extends the forms of critique which feminist scholarship has, to date, developed of the regulation of abortion provision in the UK.
本文阐述了参与当代堕胎服务的苏格兰医疗专业人员如何构建对女性生殖决策的分层期望。通过42次半结构化访谈,我揭示了医疗专业人员用以构成请求堕胎的女性主体“合理性”的偶然话语。具体而言,我说明了如何将青年、年龄、生育状况和社会阶层作为区分患者“类型”的标准,根据这些标准,某些患者的堕胎请求被认为特别容易理解,而另一些则特别成问题。我将这种区分过程概念化为一种“分层生殖”形式(科伦,1995;金斯伯格和拉普,1995),并认为这一过程具有重要意义,原因有二。其一,它说明了21世纪英国关于堕胎和母亲身份的主流话语的运作方式。其二,它扩展了女权主义学术研究迄今为止对英国堕胎服务监管所形成的批判形式。