Kang Tarina Lee, Berona Kristin, Elkhunovich Marsha A, Medero-Colon Roberto, Seif Dina, Chilstrom Mikaela L, Mailhot Tom
Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles County and the University of Southern California (LAC + USC) Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Mar 13;6:171-5. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S72159. eCollection 2015.
To evaluate two educational methods for point-of-care ultrasound (POC US) in order to: 1) determine participant test performance and attitudes in using POC US and 2) compare cost and preparation time to run the courses.
This was a pilot study conducted at a county teaching hospital. Subjects were assigned to participate in either a large group course with live classroom lectures (Group A) or a group asked to watch 4.5 hours of online prerecorded lectures (Group B). Both groups participated in small-group hands-on training after watching the lectures. Both groups took a pre- and post-course exam, and completed course surveys. Cost and time spent running the courses were also compared.
Forty-seven physicians participated in the study. The pre-test and post-test scores between the two groups did not differ significantly. Of those with prior ultrasound experience, the majority of both groups preferred to continue classroom-based teaching for future courses. Interestingly, in the groups who had no ultrasound experience prior to their course participation, there was a higher percentage who preferred web-based teaching. Lastly, Group B was shown to have the potential to take less preparatory time when compared to Group A.
A web-based curriculum in POC US appears to be a promising and potentially time saving alternative to live classroom lectures and seems to offer similar educational benefits for the postgraduate learner.
评估两种即时超声(POC US)的教学方法,以便:1)确定参与者在使用POC US方面的测试表现和态度;2)比较开设课程的成本和准备时间。
这是一项在县教学医院进行的试点研究。受试者被分配参加大型现场课堂讲座的课程(A组)或观看4.5小时在线预录制讲座的小组(B组)。两组在观看讲座后都参加了小组实践培训。两组都进行了课前和课后考试,并完成了课程调查。还比较了开设课程的成本和花费的时间。
47名医生参与了该研究。两组之间的测试前和测试后分数没有显著差异。在有超声经验的人中,两组中的大多数都倾向于在未来的课程中继续采用基于课堂的教学。有趣的是,在课程参与前没有超声经验的小组中,更喜欢网络教学的比例更高。最后,与A组相比,B组显示出有可能花费更少的准备时间。
基于网络的POC US课程似乎是现场课堂讲座的一种有前景且可能节省时间的替代方案,并且似乎为研究生学习者提供了类似的教育益处。