Suppr超能文献

利用¹⁵N自然丰度确定巴西热带地区的氮肥施用制度和蔬菜生产系统。

Identifying N fertilizer regime and vegetable production system in tropical Brazil using (15) N natural abundance.

作者信息

Inácio Caio T, Urquiaga Segundo, Chalk Phillip M, Mata Maria Gabriela F, Souza Paulo O

机构信息

EMBRAPA-Soils, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Research Center of Soil, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

EMBRAPA-Agrobiology, Research Center of Agrobiology, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Dec;95(15):3025-32. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7177. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted in areas of vegetable production in tropical Brazil, with the objectives of (i) measuring the variation in δ(15)  N in soils, organic N fertilizer sources and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) from different farming systems, (ii) measuring whether plant δ(15)  N can differentiate organic versus conventional lettuce and (iii) identifying the factors affecting lettuce δ(15)  N.

RESULTS

Samples of soil, lettuce and organic inputs were taken from two organic, one conventional and one hydroponic farm. The two organic farms had different N-sources with δ(15)  N values ranging from 0.0 to +14.9‰ (e.g. leguminous green manure and animal manure compost, respectively), and differed significantly (P < 0.05) in lettuce δ(15)  N (+9.2 ± 1.1‰ and +14.3 ± 1.0‰). Conventional lettuce δ(15)  N (+8.5 ± 2.7‰) differed from hydroponic lettuce δ(15)  N (+4.5 ± 0.2‰) due to manure inputs. The N from leguminous green manure made a small contribution to the N nutrition of lettuce in the multi-N-source organic farm.

CONCLUSION

To differentiate organic versus conventional farms using δ(15)  N the several subsets of mode of fertilization should be considered. Comparisons of δ(15)  N of soil, organic inputs and lettuce allowed a qualitative analysis of the relative importance of different N inputs.

摘要

背景

本研究在巴西热带地区的蔬菜生产区开展,目标如下:(i)测量不同种植系统下土壤、有机氮肥源和生菜(Lactuca sativa L.)中δ(15) N的变化;(ii)测定植物δ(15) N是否能够区分有机生菜和传统生菜;(iii)确定影响生菜δ(15) N的因素。

结果

从两个有机农场、一个传统农场和一个水培农场采集了土壤、生菜和有机投入物样本。两个有机农场的氮源不同,δ(15) N值范围为0.0至 +14.9‰(例如分别为豆科绿肥和动物粪便堆肥),生菜的δ(15) N差异显著(P < 0.05)(分别为 +9.2 ± 1.1‰ 和 +14.3 ± 1.0‰)。由于粪肥投入,传统生菜的δ(15) N(+8.5 ± 2.7‰)与水培生菜的δ(15) N(+4.5 ± 0.2‰)不同。在多氮源有机农场中,来自豆科绿肥的氮对生菜的氮营养贡献较小。

结论

为了利用δ(15) N区分有机农场和传统农场,应考虑施肥方式的几个子集。对土壤、有机投入物和生菜的δ(15) N进行比较,可以对不同氮投入的相对重要性进行定性分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验