Suppr超能文献

巴西先前接受过培训的绵羊和山羊养殖户对FAMACHA©系统的评估。

FAMACHA© system assessment by previously trained sheep and goat farmers in Brazil.

作者信息

Maia Dhéri, Rosalinski-Moraes Fernanda, de Torres-Acosta Juan Felipe, Cintra Maria Christine Rizzon, Sotomaior Cristina Santos

机构信息

Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), São José dos Pinhais, Paraná 83010-500, Brazil.

Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Ceara St, n/n, Block2T, Office 104, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais 38405-315, Brazil.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 2015 Apr 30;209(3-4):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.033. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of adoption and the correct use of the FAMACHA© system amongst sheep and goat farmers trained in a previous hands-on course. A survey was carried out with 1375 people who received FAMACHA© training from July 2009 to May 2011 in Paraná State, Brazil. The survey was conducted from March 2012 to May 2013. Firstly, a questionnaire was applied with specific questions for farmers about their anthelmintic (AH) treatment practices before and after the FAMACHA© training. In a second step, eight of the questionnaire respondents classified as sheep or goat farmers were contacted for an in loco visit during which the application of the FAMACHA© system was evaluated in the respective farms and blood samples were collected from 20 animals to calculate sensitivity and specificity. A total of 124 farmers responded the questionnaire (9% of project participants). Farmers accounted for 48.4% of total responses. Half of these farmers (51.6%) reported losses related to parasites in their property before the training. Antiparasitic treatments, at fixed intervals, were responsible for 93.1% of deworming practices before the training project. FAMACHA© was unknown for 51.7% of the respondents, and 31% knew the chart, but did not use it. After the project, 69% had adopted the system and 83% assessed the animals at regular intervals. However, 18.9% did not evaluate all animals. During the in loco visits, problems reported included the incorrect exposure of the ocular mucosa (50% of farmers) and not using the chart (87.5%). Also, 62.5% did not keep records of the FAMACHA© assessment history of the flock. However, sensitivity was 100%, with 0% false negatives. We conclude that, amongst farmers who adopted the system, despite some methodological errors regarding its use, the objectives were met in terms of reducing the number of anthelmintic treatments and providing anemic animals with AH treatment. Trained farmers seemed to require technical guidance post-training to promote effective use of the FAMACHA© system.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在之前的实践课程中接受培训的绵羊和山羊养殖户对FAMACHA©系统的采用程度和正确使用情况。对2009年7月至2011年5月在巴西巴拉那州接受FAMACHA©培训的1375人进行了一项调查。该调查于2012年3月至2013年5月进行。首先,向养殖户发放了一份问卷,其中包含关于他们在FAMACHA©培训前后驱虫(AH)治疗做法的具体问题。第二步,联系了问卷中被归类为绵羊或山羊养殖户的8人进行实地考察,在此期间评估了各自农场中FAMACHA©系统的应用情况,并从20只动物身上采集了血样以计算敏感性和特异性。共有124名养殖户回复了问卷(占项目参与者的9%)。养殖户占总回复人数的48.4%。这些养殖户中有一半(51.6%)报告在培训前其养殖场存在寄生虫相关损失。在培训项目之前,固定间隔的抗寄生虫治疗占驱虫做法的93.1%。51.7%的受访者不知道FAMACHA©,31%的人知道该图表但未使用。项目结束后,69%的人采用了该系统,83%的人定期对动物进行评估。然而,18.9%的人没有对所有动物进行评估。在实地考察期间,报告的问题包括眼黏膜暴露不正确(50%的养殖户)和未使用图表(87.5%)。此外,62.5%的人没有记录畜群的FAMACHA©评估历史。然而,敏感性为100%,假阴性率为0%。我们得出结论,在采用该系统的养殖户中,尽管在使用方面存在一些方法错误,但在减少驱虫治疗次数和为贫血动物提供AH治疗方面达到了目标。受过培训的养殖户在培训后似乎需要技术指导以促进FAMACHA©系统的有效使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验