Kramer J L K, Jutzeler C R, Haefeli J, Curt A, Freund P
Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; The Hulse Spinal Cord Injury Laboratory, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA, USA; ICORD/School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):762-768. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.054. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
The purpose of this study was to determine if local gray and white matter volume variations between subjects could account for variability in responses to CHEP stimulation.
Structural magnetic resonance imaging was used to perform voxel-based morphometry (VBM) of gray and white matter in 30 neurologically healthy subjects. Contact heat stimulation was performed on the dorsum of the right hand at the base of the thumb. Evoked potentials were acquired from a vertex-recording electrode referenced to linked ears.
Controlling for age, total intracranial volume, and skull/scalp thickness, CHEP amplitude and pain rating were not significantly correlated between subjects. A VBM region of interest approach demonstrated a significant interaction between pain rating and N2 amplitude in the right insular cortex (p<0.05, family-wise error corrected, FWE). In white matter, a significant interaction was localized in the right inferior frontal occipital fasciculus (IFOF, p<0.05 FWE).
Accounting for gray matter volume in the right insular cortex, resulted in a significant relationship between CHEP amplitude and pain rating.
This finding suggests that the discrepancy between pain ratings and the amplitude of evoked potentials is not solely related to measurement artifact, but rather attributable, in part, to anatomical differences between subjects.
本研究旨在确定受试者之间局部灰质和白质体积变化是否能解释对接触性热痛刺激(CHEP)反应的变异性。
采用结构磁共振成像对30名神经功能正常的受试者进行灰质和白质的基于体素的形态学测量(VBM)。在右手拇指根部的背侧进行接触热刺激。从参考双耳的头顶记录电极采集诱发电位。
在控制年龄、总颅内体积和颅骨/头皮厚度后,受试者之间的CHEP振幅和疼痛评分无显著相关性。基于感兴趣区的VBM方法显示,右侧岛叶皮质的疼痛评分与N2振幅之间存在显著交互作用(p<0.05,经家族性错误校正,FWE)。在白质中,显著交互作用定位于右侧额枕下束(IFOF,p<0.05 FWE)。
考虑右侧岛叶皮质的灰质体积后,CHEP振幅与疼痛评分之间存在显著关系。
这一发现表明,疼痛评分与诱发电位振幅之间的差异并非仅与测量伪影有关,部分原因可能是受试者之间的解剖学差异。