Suppr超能文献

常识与社会学解释。

Common sense and sociological explanations.

作者信息

Watts Duncan J

出版信息

AJS. 2014 Sep;120(2):313-51. doi: 10.1086/678271.

Abstract

Sociologists have long advocated a sociological approach to explanation by contrasting it with common sense. The argument of this article, however, is that sociologists rely on common sense more than they realize. Moreover, this unacknowledged reliance causes serious problems for their explanations of social action, that is, for why people do what they do. Many such explanations, it is argued, conflate understandability with causality in ways that are not valid by the standards of scientific explanation. It follows that if sociologists want their explanations to be scientifically valid, they must evaluate them specifically on those grounds--in particular, by forcing them to make predictions. In becoming more scientific, however, it is predicted that sociologists' explanations will also become less satisfying from an intuitive, sense-making perspective. Even as novel sources of data and improved methods open exciting new directions for sociological research, therefore, sociologists will increasingly have to choose between unsatisfying scientific explanations and satisfying but unscientific stories.

摘要

长期以来,社会学家一直主张采用社会学方法进行解释,并将其与常识进行对比。然而,本文的观点是,社会学家对常识的依赖程度超出了他们的认知。此外,这种未被承认的依赖给他们对社会行为的解释带来了严重问题,即人们为什么会做他们所做的事情。有人认为,许多这样的解释以不符合科学解释标准的方式将可理解性与因果关系混为一谈。因此,如果社会学家希望他们的解释具有科学有效性,他们必须具体基于这些标准对其进行评估——特别是通过迫使它们做出预测。然而,预计在变得更加科学的过程中,从直观的、有意义的角度来看,社会学家的解释也会变得不那么令人满意。因此,即使新的数据来源和改进的方法为社会学研究开辟了令人兴奋的新方向,社会学家也将越来越不得不在不令人满意的科学解释和令人满意但不科学的故事之间做出选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验