Contador Israel, Bermejo-Pareja Felix, Puertas-Martin Veronica, Benito-Leon Julian
Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Salamanca. Avda. de la Merced 109-131. Postal code: ES- 37005; Salamanca, Spain.
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2015;12(4):350-7. doi: 10.2174/1567205012666150324181327.
This research aims to determine whether residence (rural vs. urban) at different life stages (childhood, adulthood, and late life) is associated with increased risk of incident dementia in a population-based cohort of older Spaniards.
In this prospective study, 2,711 participants aged 65 years and older were assessed at baseline and 3 years later. All cases of incident dementia were diagnosed using DSM-IV criteria. The relationship between residence and the relative risk of dementia was analysed using Cox's regression models. Demographics, comorbidity index, consumption (tobacco / alcohol) and doubtful dementia diagnosis were considered as possible confounders.
At the three-year follow-up, 91 cases of dementia were detected. Lower education and occupational attainment were associated with a higher incidence of dementia three years later. Rural residence in adulthood was associated with a significantly higher risk of dementia at the follow-up. Childhood rural residence revealed a marked trend for risk of dementia (p = 0.08), but it was nonsignificant in later life. The risk of dementia was considerably higher for the rural/low-education group than for the urban/high-education group, for both childhood and adulthood residence. Finally, people from areas with the lowest socio- economic status Arévalo (rural, blue-collar) and Margaritas (urban, blue-collar) showed higher risk of dementia than people from Lista (urban, mixed white/blue collar).
In this cohort, early and mid-life stages rural residence was a risk factor for dementia, but not later-life rural residence. The rural residence effect was noticeably higher in people with a lower educational level.
本研究旨在确定在不同生命阶段(儿童期、成年期和老年期)居住在农村还是城市,是否与西班牙老年人群队列中痴呆症发病风险增加有关。
在这项前瞻性研究中,对2711名65岁及以上的参与者在基线时和3年后进行了评估。所有痴呆症发病病例均按照《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版标准进行诊断。使用Cox回归模型分析居住情况与痴呆症相对风险之间的关系。人口统计学特征、合并症指数、消费情况(烟草/酒精)以及可疑的痴呆症诊断被视为可能的混杂因素。
在三年的随访中,检测到91例痴呆症病例。较低的教育程度和职业成就与三年后较高的痴呆症发病率相关。成年期居住在农村与随访时显著较高的痴呆症风险相关。儿童期居住在农村显示出痴呆症风险的明显趋势(p = 0.08),但在老年期不显著。对于儿童期和成年期居住情况,农村/低教育程度组的痴呆症风险明显高于城市/高教育程度组。最后,来自社会经济地位最低地区阿雷瓦洛(农村,蓝领)和玛格丽塔斯(城市,蓝领)的人比来自利斯塔(城市,白/蓝领混合)的人患痴呆症的风险更高。
在这个队列中,生命早期和中年阶段居住在农村是痴呆症的一个风险因素,但老年期居住在农村则不是。农村居住的影响在教育水平较低的人群中明显更高。