Hahn Robert A, Knopf John A, Wilson Sandra Jo, Truman Benedict I, Milstein Bobby, Johnson Robert L, Fielding Jonathan E, Muntaner Carles J M, Jones Camara Phyllis, Fullilove Mindy T, Moss Regina Davis, Ueffing Erin, Hunt Pete C
Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services.
Community Guide Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 May;48(5):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
High school completion (HSC) is an established predictor of long-term morbidity and mortality. U.S. rates of HSC are substantially lower among students from low-income families and most racial/ethnic minority populations than students from high-income families and the non-Hispanic white population. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of programs to increase HSC and the potential of these programs to improve lifelong health among at-risk students.
A search located a meta-analysis (search period 1985-2010/2011) on the effects of programs to increase HSC or General Educational Development (GED) diploma receipt; the meta-analysis was concordant with Community Guide definitions and methodologic standards. Programs were assessed separately for the general student population (152 studies) and students who were parents or pregnant (15 studies). A search for studies published between 2010 and August 2012 located ten more recent studies, which were assessed for consistency with the meta-analysis. Analyses were conducted in 2013.
The review focused on the meta-analysis. Program effectiveness was measured as the increased rate of HSC (or GED receipt) by the intervention group compared with controls. All assessed program types were effective in increasing HSC in the general student population: vocational training, alternative schooling, social-emotional skills training, college-oriented programming, mentoring and counseling, supplemental academic services, school and class restructuring, multiservice packages, attendance monitoring and contingencies, community service, and case management. For students who had children or were pregnant, attendance monitoring and multiservice packages were effective. Ten studies published after the search period for the meta-analysis were consistent with its findings.
There is strong evidence that a variety of HSC programs can improve high school or GED completion rates. Because many programs are targeted to high-risk students and communities, they are likely to advance health equity.
高中结业(HSC)是长期发病率和死亡率的既定预测指标。与高收入家庭和非西班牙裔白人学生相比,低收入家庭以及大多数种族/族裔少数群体学生的美国高中结业率要低得多。本系统评价评估了提高高中结业率项目的有效性以及这些项目改善高危学生终身健康的潜力。
一项检索找到了一项关于提高高中结业率或获得普通教育发展(GED)文凭项目效果的荟萃分析(检索时间段为1985 - 2010/2011年);该荟萃分析符合《社区指南》的定义和方法学标准。分别对普通学生群体(152项研究)以及身为父母或怀孕的学生(15项研究)的项目进行了评估。一项对2010年至2012年8月发表的研究的检索又找到了另外十项近期研究,并对这些研究与荟萃分析的一致性进行了评估。分析于2013年进行。
该评价聚焦于荟萃分析。项目有效性通过干预组与对照组相比高中结业率(或获得GED文凭率)的增加幅度来衡量。所有评估的项目类型在提高普通学生群体的高中结业率方面均有效:职业培训、替代学校教育、社会情感技能培训、以大学为导向的规划、辅导与咨询、补充学术服务、学校和班级重组、综合服务包、出勤监测与应急措施、社区服务以及病例管理。对于有孩子或怀孕的学生,出勤监测和综合服务包有效。在荟萃分析检索时间段之后发表的十项研究与其结果一致。
有强有力的证据表明,各种高中结业率项目能够提高高中或GED结业率。由于许多项目针对高危学生和社区,它们很可能促进健康公平。