Steele Michael A, Rompré Ghislain, Stratford Jeffrey A, Zhang Hongmao, Suchocki Matthew, Marino Shealyn
Department of Biology, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA.
The Scotts Company, Marysville, OH, USA.
Integr Zool. 2015 May;10(3):257-66. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12134.
Scatterhoarding rodents often place caches in the open where pilferage rates are reduced, suggesting that they tradeoff higher risks of predation for more secure cache sites. We tested this hypothesis in two study systems by measuring predation risks inferred from measures of giving-up densities (GUDs) at known cache sites and other sites for comparison. Rodent GUDs were measured with small trays containing 3 L of fine sand mixed with sunflower seeds. In the first experiment, we relied on a 2-year seed dispersal study in a natural forest to identify caches of eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) and then measured GUDs at: (i) these caches; (ii) comparable points along logs and rocks where rodent activity was assumed highest; and (iii) a set of random points. We found that GUDs and, presumably, predation risks, were higher at both cache and random points than those with cover. At the second site, we measured GUDs of eastern gray squirrels in an open park system and found that GUDs were consistently lowest at the base of the tree compared to more open sites, where previous studies show caching by squirrels to be highest and pilferage rates by naïve competitors to be lowest. These results confirm that predation risks can influence scatterhoarding decisions but that they are also highly context dependent, and that the landscape of fear, now so well documented in the literature, could potentially shape the temporal and spatial patterns of seedling establishment and forest regeneration in systems where scatterhoarding is common.
分散贮藏的啮齿动物常常将贮藏物放置在开阔地带,这样被偷窃的几率会降低,这表明它们用更高的被捕食风险换取更安全的贮藏地点。我们在两个研究系统中对这一假设进行了测试,通过测量从已知贮藏地点和其他用于比较的地点的放弃密度(GUDs)推断出的捕食风险。用装有3升细沙和向日葵种子混合物的小托盘来测量啮齿动物的GUDs。在第一个实验中,我们依靠在一片天然森林中进行的为期两年的种子传播研究来确定东部灰松鼠(Sciurus carolinensis)的贮藏点,然后在以下地点测量GUDs:(i)这些贮藏点;(ii)沿着假定啮齿动物活动最频繁的原木和岩石的可比点;(iii)一组随机点。我们发现,贮藏点和随机点的GUDs以及推测的捕食风险都高于有掩护的点。在第二个地点,我们在一个开放公园系统中测量了东部灰松鼠的GUDs,发现与更开阔的地点相比(先前的研究表明松鼠在这些开阔地点的贮藏量最高,而单纯竞争者的偷窃率最低),树基部的GUDs始终是最低的。这些结果证实捕食风险会影响分散贮藏的决策,但它们也高度依赖于环境,而且文献中已有充分记载的恐惧景观可能会在分散贮藏普遍存在的系统中塑造幼苗建立和森林更新的时间和空间模式。