Jia Chang-Ku, Weng Jie, Chen You-Ke, Yang Qing-Zhuang, Fu Yu, Qin Qi-Fan, Yu Wei-Ming
Chang-Ku Jia, Jie Weng, You-Ke Chen, Qing-Zhuang Yang, Yu Fu, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou 570102, Hainan Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3564-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3564.
To evaluate the feasibility of hepatectomy and primary closure of common bile duct for intrahepatic and extrahepatic calculi.
From January 2008 to May 2013, anatomic hepatectomy followed by biliary tract exploration without biliary drainage (non-drainage group) was performed in 43 patients with intrahepatic and extrahepatic calculi. After hepatectomy, flexible choledochoscopy was used to extract residual stones and observe the intrahepatic bile duct and common bile duct (CBD) for determination of biliary stricture and dilatation. Function of the sphincter of Oddi was determined by manometry of the CBD. Primary closure of the CBD without T-tube drainage or bilioenteric anastomosis was performed when there was no biliary stricture or sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Dexamethasone and anisodamine were intravenously injected 2-3 d after surgery to prevent postoperative retrograde infection due to intraoperative bile duct irrigation, and to maintain relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi, respectively. During the same period, anatomic hepatectomy followed by biliary tract exploration with biliary drainage (drainage group) was performed in 48 patients as the control group. Postoperative complications and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.
There was no operative mortality in either group of patients. Compared to intrahepatic and extrabiliary drainage, hepatectomy with primary closure of the CBD (non-drainage) did not increase the incidence of complications, including residual stones, bile leakage, pancreatitis and cholangitis (P > 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay and costs were nevertheless significantly less in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group. The median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group (11.2 ± 2.8 d vs 15.4 ± 2.1 d, P = 0.000). The average postoperative cost of treatment was lower in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group (29325.6 ± 5668.2 yuan vs 32933.3 ± 6235.1 yuan, P = 0.005).
Hepatectomy followed by choledochoendoscopic stone extraction without biliary drainage is a safe and effective treatment of hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.
评估肝切除术联合胆总管一期缝合治疗肝内外胆管结石的可行性。
2008年1月至2013年5月,对43例肝内外胆管结石患者行解剖性肝切除,随后行胆道探查且不放置胆道引流管(非引流组)。肝切除术后,采用可弯曲胆管镜取残余结石,并观察肝内胆管及胆总管以确定胆管狭窄和扩张情况。通过胆总管测压确定Oddi括约肌功能。当不存在胆管狭窄或Oddi括约肌功能障碍时,对胆总管进行一期缝合,不放置T管引流或行胆肠吻合术。术后2 - 3天静脉注射地塞米松和山莨菪碱,分别预防术中胆管冲洗导致的术后逆行感染以及维持Oddi括约肌松弛。同期,对48例患者行解剖性肝切除,随后行胆道探查并放置胆道引流管(引流组)作为对照组。比较两组患者术后并发症及住院时间。
两组患者均无手术死亡病例。与肝内及肝外引流相比,肝切除联合胆总管一期缝合(非引流)并未增加包括残余结石、胆漏、胰腺炎和胆管炎在内的并发症发生率(P > 0.05)。然而,非引流组术后住院时间和费用显著低于引流组。非引流组术后中位住院时间短于引流组(11.2 ± 2.8天 vs 15.4 ± 2.1天,P = 0.000)。非引流组术后平均治疗费用低于引流组(29325.6 ± 5668.2元 vs 32933.3 ± 6235.1元,P = 0.005)。
肝切除术后行胆管镜取石且不放置胆道引流是治疗肝内胆管结石合并胆总管结石的一种安全有效的方法。