Lepri Taísa Penazzo, Colucci Vivian, Turssi Cecília Pedroso, Corona Silmara Aparecida Milori
Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry - USP, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Av. do Café, S/N Monte Alegre, CEP 14040-904, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dental School, University of Ribeirão Preto, Avenida Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirânia, CEP 14096-900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Jun;60(6):941-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
Interest in erosion and its role in tooth wear has increased considerably. Due to the limited contribution of patients in modifying their dietary habits, therapeutic resources aiming to reduce the progression of erosion-like lesions have been discussed. This study sought to evaluate the effect of TiF4 and CO2 laser in controlling the permeability of in situ eroded enamel.
Ten volunteers wore an intraoral palatal device containing two enamel slabs, treated with TiF4 gel and TiF4 gel + CO2 or placebo gel and placebo gel + CO2. After the washout period, volunteers were crossed over to the other treatment. During both phases, specimens were submitted to erosive challenges and then evaluated for permeability measured as the percentage of copper ion penetration over the total enamel thickness.
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that there was a significant interaction between the factors under study (p = 0.0002). Tukey's test showed that TiF4 significantly reduced the enamel permeability of eroded enamel specimens, regardless of whether CO2 laser irradiation was performed.
It may be concluded that when the placebo gel was applied, CO2 laser was able to reduce enamel permeability; however, when TiF4 was applied, laser irradiation did not imply a reduction in permeability. TiF4 provided a lower permeability of eroded enamel, regardless of whether the CO2 laser was used.
对牙釉质侵蚀及其在牙齿磨损中作用的关注显著增加。由于患者在改变饮食习惯方面作用有限,因此对旨在减少侵蚀样病变进展的治疗资源进行了讨论。本研究旨在评估四氟化钛(TiF4)和二氧化碳激光对原位侵蚀牙釉质渗透性的控制效果。
10名志愿者佩戴一种口内腭部装置,该装置包含两块牙釉质片,分别用TiF4凝胶和TiF4凝胶+二氧化碳或安慰剂凝胶和安慰剂凝胶+二氧化碳进行处理。洗脱期后,志愿者交叉接受另一种治疗。在两个阶段中,将标本进行侵蚀挑战,然后评估其渗透性,以铜离子穿透占牙釉质总厚度的百分比来衡量。
双向方差分析(ANOVA)显示,所研究的因素之间存在显著交互作用(p = 0.0002)。Tukey检验表明,无论是否进行二氧化碳激光照射,TiF4均能显著降低侵蚀牙釉质标本的牙釉质渗透性。
可以得出结论,当应用安慰剂凝胶时,二氧化碳激光能够降低牙釉质渗透性;然而,当应用TiF4时,激光照射并不意味着渗透性降低。无论是否使用二氧化碳激光,TiF4均能使侵蚀牙釉质的渗透性降低。