Suppr超能文献

针刺样经皮电神经刺激与毛果芸香碱治疗放射性口干症的比较:RTOG 0537 三期研究结果

Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Pilocarpine in Treating Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Results of RTOG 0537 Phase 3 Study.

作者信息

Wong Raimond K W, Deshmukh Snehal, Wyatt Gwen, Sagar Stephen, Singh Anurag K, Sultanem Khalil, Nguyen-Tân Phuc F, Yom Sue S, Cardinale Joseph, Yao Min, Hodson Ian, Matthiesen Chance L, Suh John, Thakrar Harish, Pugh Stephanie L, Berk Lawrence

机构信息

McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.050. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

This report presents the analysis of the RTOG 0537 multicenter randomized study that compared acupuncture-like transcutaneous stimulation (ALTENS) with pilocarpine (PC) for relieving radiation-induced xerostomia.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were randomized to twice-weekly 20-minute ALTENS sessions for 24 sessions during 12 weeks or PC (5 mg 3 times daily for 12 weeks). The primary endpoint was the change in the University of Michigan Xerostomia-Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS) scores from baseline to 9 months from randomization (MFR). Secondary endpoints included basal and citric acid primed whole salivary production (WSP), ratios of positive responders (defined as patients with ≥20% reduction in overall radiation-induced xerostomia symptom burden), and the presence of adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-eight patients were randomized. Only 96 patients completed the required XeQOLS and were evaluable at 9 MFR (representing merely 68.6% statistical power). Seventy-six patients were evaluable at 15 MFR. The median change in the overall XeQOLS in ALTENS and PC groups at 9 and 15 MFR were -0.53 and -0.27 (P=.45) and -0.6 and -0.47 (P=.21). The corresponding percentages of positive responders were 81% and 72% (P=.34) and 83% and 63% (P=.04). Changes in WSP were not significantly different between the groups. Grade 3 or less adverse events, mostly consisting of grade 1, developed in 20.8% of patients in the ALTENS group and in 61.6% of the PC group.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed effect size was smaller than hypothesized, and statistical power was limited because only 96 of the recruited 148 patients were evaluable. The primary endpoint-the change in radiation-induced xerostomia symptom burden at 9 MFR-was not significantly different between the ALTENS and PC groups. There was significantly less toxicity in patients receiving ALTENS.

摘要

目的和目标

本报告呈现了RTOG 0537多中心随机研究的分析结果,该研究比较了针刺样经皮刺激(ALTENS)与毛果芸香碱(PC)在缓解放射性口干方面的效果。

方法和材料

符合条件的患者被随机分为两组,一组每周接受两次、每次20分钟的ALTENS治疗,共进行24次,为期12周;另一组服用PC(每日3次,每次5毫克,共12周)。主要终点是从基线到随机分组后9个月(MFR),密歇根大学口干相关生活质量量表(XeQOLS)评分的变化。次要终点包括基础唾液分泌量和柠檬酸激发后的全唾液分泌量(WSP)、阳性反应者的比例(定义为总体放射性口干症状负担减轻≥20%的患者),以及根据不良事件通用术语标准第3版确定的不良事件的发生情况。进行了意向性分析。

结果

148名患者被随机分组。只有96名患者完成了所需的XeQOLS评估,并且在9个月MFR时可进行评估(仅代表68.6%的统计效能)。76名患者在15个月MFR时可进行评估。在9个月和15个月MFR时,ALTENS组和PC组的总体XeQOLS的中位数变化分别为-0.53和-0.27(P = 0.45)以及-0.6和-0.47(P = 0.21)。相应的阳性反应者百分比分别为81%和72%(P = 0.34)以及83%和63%(P = 0.04)。两组之间WSP的变化无显著差异。ALTENS组20.8%的患者出现3级及以下不良事件,主要为1级;PC组这一比例为61.6%。

结论

观察到的效应大小小于假设值,且统计效能有限,因为在招募的148名患者中只有96名可进行评估。主要终点——9个月MFR时放射性口干症状负担的变化——在ALTENS组和PC组之间无显著差异。接受ALTENS治疗的患者毒性明显较小。

相似文献

1
Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Pilocarpine in Treating Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Results of RTOG 0537 Phase 3 Study.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.050. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
4
Xerostomia health-related quality of life: NRG oncology RTOG 0537.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Sep;25(9):2323-33. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1255-0. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
7
Phase 2 Study of Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.
Integr Cancer Ther. 2016 Jun;15(2):153-64. doi: 10.1177/1534735415627926. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Acupuncture in Managing Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Int J Med Sci. 2025 May 31;22(11):2802-2815. doi: 10.7150/ijms.110366. eCollection 2025.
2
Cancer treatment-related xerostomia: basics, therapeutics, and future perspectives.
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Nov 30;29(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02167-x.
3
Salivary toxicity from PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals: What we have learned and where we are going.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2024 Jun;127:102748. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102748. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
5
Acupuncture therapy for radiotherapy-induced adverse effect: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;10:1026971. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1026971. eCollection 2022.
6
Treatment alternatives for dry mouth: A scoping review.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Oct 1;14(10):e846-e853. doi: 10.4317/jced.59912. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Therapeutic Strategies for Dry Mouth Management with Emphasis on Electrostimulation as a Treatment Option.
Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 22;2021:6043488. doi: 10.1155/2021/6043488. eCollection 2021.
8
Acupuncture for radiation-induced toxicity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review based on PICO criteria.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):2083-2097. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07002-1. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
9

本文引用的文献

6
Efficacy of pilocarpine lozenge for post-radiation xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer.
Aust Dent J. 2006 Dec;51(4):333-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00453.x.
9
Acupuncture for xerostomia: clinical update.
Cancer. 2002 Feb 15;94(4):1151-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验