Buldt Andrew K, Levinger Pazit, Murley George S, Menz Hylton B, Nester Christopher J, Landorf Karl B
Discipline of Podiatry, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia; Lower Extremity and Gait Studies Program, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Institute of Sport, Exercise & Active Living, College of Sport and Exercise Science, Victoria University, Footscray, VIC 8001, Australia.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jun;30(5):431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Foot posture has been postulated as a risk factor for overuse injuries of the knee, however the link between foot posture and knee joint function is unclear. The aims of this study were to: (i) compare knee adduction moment and knee joint rotations between normal, planus and cavus foot posture groups, and (ii) to determine the relationship between rearfoot and midfoot joint rotations and knee adduction moment magnitude.
Rotation of the knee, rearfoot and midfoot was evaluated in 97 healthy adults that were classified as normal (n=37), cavus (n=30) or planus (n=30) for the Foot Posture Index, Arch Index and normalised navicular height. One way analyses of variance were used to compare tri-planar knee joint rotation, knee adduction moment peak variables and knee adduction angular impulse between foot posture groups. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to investigate the association between rearfoot and midfoot joint rotation during initial contact phase and the magnitude of 1st knee adduction moment peak.
The planus group displayed significantly greater external rotation angle at heel contact compared to both normal and cavus groups. The planus groups also displayed greater extension at heel contact and sagittal plane flexion range of motion during propulsion and early swing compared to the cavus group. Otherwise, differences between groups were characterised by small effect sizes. There was no association between rearfoot or midfoot joint rotations and knee adduction moment.
These findings suggest that in healthy individuals, foot posture and foot joint rotations do not substantially influence knee joint rotations and knee adduction moment while walking at a comfortable pace.
足部姿势被认为是膝关节过度使用损伤的一个风险因素,然而足部姿势与膝关节功能之间的联系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是:(i)比较正常足、扁平足和高弓足姿势组之间的膝关节内收力矩和膝关节旋转,以及(ii)确定后足和中足关节旋转与膝关节内收力矩大小之间的关系。
对97名健康成年人的膝关节、后足和中足的旋转进行了评估,这些成年人根据足部姿势指数、足弓指数和标准化舟骨高度被分类为正常(n = 37)、高弓足(n = 30)或扁平足(n = 30)。采用单因素方差分析来比较足部姿势组之间的三平面膝关节旋转、膝关节内收力矩峰值变量和膝关节内收角冲量。使用Pearson相关系数来研究初始接触阶段后足和中足关节旋转与第一个膝关节内收力矩峰值大小之间的关联。
与正常组和高弓足组相比,扁平足组在足跟接触时显示出明显更大的外旋角度。与高弓足组相比,扁平足组在足跟接触时也显示出更大的伸展,并且在推进和早期摆动期间矢状面屈曲活动范围更大。否则,组间差异的特点是效应量较小。后足或中足关节旋转与膝关节内收力矩之间没有关联。
这些发现表明,在健康个体中,以舒适的步伐行走时,足部姿势和足部关节旋转不会对膝关节旋转和膝关节内收力矩产生实质性影响。