Schwaederle Maria, Daniels Gregory A, Piccioni David E, Fanta Paul T, Schwab Richard B, Shimabukuro Kelly A, Parker Barbara A, Kurzrock Razelle
Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Jun;14(6):1488-94. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-1061. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Despite the increased use of molecular diagnostics, the extent to which patients who have these tests harbor potentially actionable aberrations is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 439 patients with diverse cancers, for whom next-generation sequencing (mostly 236-gene panel) had been performed. Data pertaining to the molecular alterations identified, as well as associated treatment suggestions (on- or off-label, or experimental), were extracted from molecular diagnostic reports. Most patients (420/439; 96%) had at least one molecular alteration: 1,813 alterations (in 207 distinct genes) were identified [the majority being mutations (62%) or amplifications (29%)]. The three most common gene abnormalities were TP53 (44%), KRAS (16%), and PIK3CA (12%). The median number of alterations per patient was 3 (range, 0-16). Nineteen patients (4%) had no alterations; 48 patients (11%) had only one alteration; and 372 patients had two or more abnormalities (85%). The median number of potentially actionable anomalies per patient was 2 (range, 0-8). Most patients (393/439; 90%) had at least one potentially actionable alteration, and in all these cases the aberration could at least be targeted by an experimental drug in a clinical trial. A total of 307 patients (70%) had an alteration that was actionable with an approved drug, but in only 89 patients (20%) was the drug approved for their disease (on-label). Next-generation sequencing identified theoretically actionable aberrations in 90% of our patients. Many of the drugs are, however, experimental or would require off-label use. Strategies to address drug access for patients harboring potentially actionable mutations are needed.
尽管分子诊断的使用有所增加,但进行这些检测的患者携带潜在可操作异常的程度尚不清楚。我们回顾性分析了439例患有不同癌症的患者,这些患者均接受了二代测序(主要是236基因检测 panel)。从分子诊断报告中提取了与所识别的分子改变以及相关治疗建议(标签内、标签外或实验性)有关的数据。大多数患者(420/439;96%)至少有一处分子改变:共识别出1813处改变(存在于207个不同基因中)[大多数为突变(62%)或扩增(29%)]。三种最常见的基因异常是TP53(44%)、KRAS(16%)和PIK3CA(12%)。每位患者改变的中位数为3(范围0 - 16)。19例患者(4%)没有改变;48例患者(11%)只有一处改变;372例患者有两处或更多异常(85%)。每位患者潜在可操作异常的中位数为2(范围0 - 8)。大多数患者(393/439;90%)至少有一处潜在可操作改变,在所有这些病例中,该异常至少可在临床试验中被实验性药物靶向。共有307例患者(70%)有可被批准药物靶向的改变,但只有89例患者(20%)的该药物被批准用于其疾病(标签内)。二代测序在90%的患者中识别出理论上可操作的异常。然而,许多药物是实验性的或需要标签外使用。需要制定策略以解决携带潜在可操作突变患者的药物获取问题。