Pot A-L, Lejoyeux M
Interne DES psychiatrie, Paris, France.
Département de psychiatrie et d'addictologie Bichat-Beaujon, 75020 Paris, France.
Encephale. 2015 Jun;41(3):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
In the new classification of the DSM-V, catatonia is individualized as a disease of its own. It is defined by presence of at least two out of five criteria: motor immobility, negativism, echolalia or echopraxia, sterile motor activity, atypical movements. The priority is to look first for organic causes: the main ones are neurologic disorders. Intoxication may also be found (illegal drugs or medication), and the role of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in catatonia remains unclear. Among the psychiatric causes, first come bipolar disorders, especially mania; then schizophrenia. Idiopathic forms can also be observed. Epidemiological work on catatonia show highly variable results, highlighting a possible underestimation of the diagnosis. Among the differential diagnoses, which are rare motor syndromes, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome are also discussed. The diagnosis of catatonia is clinical and can be obtained using standardized diagnostic scales. The use of zolpidem provides both a diagnostic and therapeutic guidance for the degree of response to drug treatment. The physiopathological hypotheses describe an intracerebral GABAergic, dopaminergic and glutamatergic dysfunction in catatonic patients. The complete mechanisms are still partly unknown. Benzodiazepines are the first treatment of choice. Electroconvulsive therapy is used secondarily or in severe cases. First-generation antipsychotics are prohibited, at the risk of worsening the catatonia in becoming malignant and lethal. The renewed interest in the catatonic syndrome during the past recent years has expanded research on the mechanisms of this syndrome and opened the way to new therapeutic options. The latest works tend to modulate the strict prohibition of antipsychotic in a catatonic patient.
在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V)的新分类中,紧张症被单独列为一种疾病。它由以下五项标准中的至少两项来定义:运动不能、违拗症、模仿言语或模仿动作、无目的运动、非典型动作。首要任务是首先寻找器质性病因:主要病因是神经系统疾病。也可能发现中毒情况(非法药物或药物),而抗精神病药物恶性综合征在紧张症中的作用仍不明确。在精神病因中,首先是双相情感障碍,尤其是躁狂发作;其次是精神分裂症。也可观察到特发性形式。关于紧张症的流行病学研究结果差异很大,这突出表明诊断可能被低估。在鉴别诊断方面,这些是罕见的运动综合征,还讨论了抗精神病药物恶性综合征和5-羟色胺综合征。紧张症的诊断是临床诊断,可使用标准化诊断量表得出。使用唑吡坦可为药物治疗反应程度提供诊断和治疗指导。病理生理假说描述了紧张症患者脑内γ-氨基丁酸能、多巴胺能和谷氨酸能功能障碍。完整机制仍部分未知。苯二氮䓬类药物是首选治疗方法。电休克治疗其次使用或用于严重病例。禁止使用第一代抗精神病药物,因为有使紧张症恶化为恶性和致命性从而加重病情的风险。近年来对紧张症综合征重新产生的兴趣扩大了对该综合征机制的研究,并为新的治疗选择开辟了道路。最新研究倾向于调整对紧张症患者使用抗精神病药物的严格禁令。