Wilson Duncan
University of Manchester, UK.
Hist Human Sci. 2014 Dec;27(5):126-146. doi: 10.1177/0952695114536715.
During the late 20 century numerical rating scales became central to the diagnosis of dementia and helped transform attitudes about its causes and prevalence. Concentrating largely on the development and use of the Blessed Dementia Scale, I argue that rating scales served professional ends during the 1960s and 1970s. They helped old age psychiatrists establish jurisdiction over conditions such as dementia and present their field as a vital component of the welfare state, where they argued that 'reliable modes of diagnosis' were vital to the allocation of resources. I show how these arguments appealed to politicians, funding bodies and patient groups, who agreed that dementia was a distinct disease and claimed research on its causes and prevention should be designated 'top priority'. But I also show that worries about the replacement of clinical acumen with technical and depersonalized methods, which could conceivably be applied by anyone, led psychiatrists to stress that rating scales had their limits and could be used only by trained experts.
在20世纪后期,数字评定量表成为痴呆症诊断的核心,并有助于改变人们对其病因和患病率的看法。主要围绕布莱斯痴呆量表的开发和使用展开论述,我认为评定量表在20世纪60年代和70年代服务于专业目的。它们帮助老年精神病医生确立了对痴呆症等病症的管辖权,并将他们的领域展现为福利国家的一个重要组成部分,他们在其中主张 “可靠的诊断方式” 对资源分配至关重要。我展示了这些论点如何吸引了政治家、资助机构和患者群体,他们一致认为痴呆症是一种独特的疾病,并声称对其病因和预防的研究应被列为 “首要任务”。但我也表明,对于用任何人都可以想象应用的技术化和非人性化方法取代临床敏锐度的担忧,导致精神病医生强调评定量表有其局限性,只能由训练有素的专家使用。