Lou Heng, Wang Hao, Zong Ying, Cheng Jin-Wei, Wei Rui-Li
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University , Shanghai , China.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Jun;31(6):1139-47. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1039504.
Prostaglandin-timolol fixed combinations (PG-timolol FCs) are now widely used to reduce intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. The efficacy and tolerability of these drugs are worthy of further exploration. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the clinical efficacy and tolerability of the three PG-timolol FCs.
Pertinent randomized, controlled trials were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials and the Chinese Biomedicine Database. The main efficacy measures were the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for the reduction from baseline to end of treatment in IOP at 9 am, 12 pm and 4 pm and diurnal curve. The main tolerability measures were the odds ratios (ORs) for the incidence of conjunctival hyperemia.
Nine studies involving 991 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Latanoprost-timolol FC (LTFC) and travoprost-timolol FC (TTFC) were not significantly different in lowering IOP at diurnal mean, 9 am, 12 pm and 4 pm. Bimatoprost-timolol FC (BTFC) provided significantly greater efficacy in lowering IOP at the three measurement time points and over the mean diurnal curve than LTFC (diurnal curve: WMD = 0.88 mmHg [95% CI, 0.42 to 1.33]; 9 am: WMD = 1.27 mmHg [0.68 to 1.86]; 12 pm: WMD = 1.16 mmHg [0.85 to 1.46]; 4 pm: WMD = 0.61 mmHg [0.51 to 0.70]) and TTFC (diurnal curve: WMD = 1.94 mmHg [0.19 to 3.68]; 9 am: WMD = 0.68 mmHg [0.15 to 1.21]; 12 pm: WMD = 0.90 mmHg [0.41 to 1.39]; 4 pm: WMD = 1.06 mmHg [0.61 to 1.51]). The incidence of hyperemia was significantly higher with BTFC than LTFC (pooled ORs: 1.85 [1.09 to 3.13]). The incidence of hyperemia was not significantly higher with TTFC than LTFC (pooled ORs: 2.52 [0.85 to 7.46]), and was not significantly higher with BTFC than TTFC (pooled OR: 1.65 [0.48 to 5.70]).
BTFC provided significantly greater efficacy in lowering IOP at diurnal mean, 9 am, 12 pm and 4 pm than LTFC and TTFC. LTFC was as effective as TTFC in lowering IOP at the four measurement time points and BTFC caused conjunctival hyperemia in more patients than LTFC. Further clinical trials are needed because of the limited number of studies.
前列腺素-噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂(PG-噻吗洛尔FCs)目前广泛用于降低青光眼患者的眼压。这些药物的疗效和耐受性值得进一步探讨。进行了一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估三种PG-噻吗洛尔FCs的临床疗效和耐受性。
通过系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和中国生物医学数据库,确定相关的随机对照试验。主要疗效指标为上午9点、中午12点和下午4点眼压从基线到治疗结束时降低的加权平均差(WMDs)以及昼夜曲线。主要耐受性指标为结膜充血发生率的比值比(ORs)。
荟萃分析纳入了9项涉及991例患者的研究。拉坦前列素-噻吗洛尔FC(LTFC)和曲伏前列素-噻吗洛尔FC(TTFC)在昼夜平均眼压、上午9点、中午12点和下午4点降低眼压方面无显著差异。在三个测量时间点及整个昼夜曲线中,比马前列素-噻吗洛尔FC(BTFC)降低眼压的疗效显著优于LTFC(昼夜曲线:WMD = 0.88 mmHg [95% CI,0.42至1.33];上午9点:WMD = 1.27 mmHg [0.68至1.86];中午12点:WMD = 1.16 mmHg [0.85至1.46];下午4点:WMD = 0.61 mmHg [0.51至0.70])和TTFC(昼夜曲线:WMD = 1.94 mmHg [0.19至3.68];上午9点:WMD = 0.68 mmHg [0.15至1.21];中午12点:WMD = 0.90 mmHg [0.41至1.39];下午4点:WMD = 1.06 mmHg [0.61至1.51])。BTFC引起的充血发生率显著高于LTFC(合并ORs:1.85 [1.09至3.13])。TTFC引起的充血发生率高于LTFC无显著差异(合并ORs:2.52 [0.85至7.46]),且BTFC引起的充血发生率高于TTFC无显著差异(合并OR:1.65 [0.48至5.70])。
在昼夜平均眼压、上午9点、中午12点和下午4点降低眼压方面,BTFC的疗效显著优于LTFC和TTFC。在四个测量时间点降低眼压方面,LTFC与TTFC效果相当,且BTFC导致结膜充血的患者比LTFC更多。由于研究数量有限,需要进一步的临床试验。